» Articles » PMID: 29632997

Human-relevant Potency Threshold (HRPT) for ERα Agonism

Overview
Journal Arch Toxicol
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2018 Apr 11
PMID 29632997
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The European Commission has recently proposed draft criteria for the identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that pose a significant hazard to humans or the environment. Identifying and characterizing toxic hazards based on the manner by which adverse effects are produced rather than on the nature of those adverse effects departs from traditional practice and requires a proper interpretation of the evidence regarding the chemical's ability to produce physiological effect(s) via a specific mode of action (MoA). The ability of any chemical to produce a physiological effect depends on its pharmacokinetics and the potency by which it acts via the various MoAs that can lead to the particular effect. A chemical's potency for a specific MoA-its mechanistic potency-is determined by two properties: (1) its affinity for the functional components that comprise the MoA, i.e., its specific receptors, enzymes, transporters, transcriptional elements, etc., and (2) its ability to alter the functional state of those components (activity). Using the agonist MoA via estrogen receptor alpha, we illustrate an empirical method for determining a human-relevant potency threshold (HRPT), defined as the minimum level of mechanistic potency necessary for a chemical to be able to act via a particular MoA in humans. One important use for an HRPT is to distinguish between chemicals that may be capable of, versus those likely to be incapable of, producing adverse effects in humans via the specified MoA. The method involves comparing chemicals that have different ERα agonist potencies with the ability of those chemicals to produce ERα-mediated agonist responses in human clinical trials. Based on this approach, we propose an HRPT for ERα agonism of 1E-04 relative to the potency of the endogenous estrogenic hormone 17β-estradiol or the pharmaceutical estrogen, 17α-ethinylestradiol. This approach provides a practical way to address Hazard Identification according to the draft criteria for identification of EDCs recently proposed by the European Commission.

Citing Articles

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) lacks endocrine disruptive potential via estrogen pathways.

Borgert C, Burgoon L Arch Toxicol. 2025; .

PMID: 39976757 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03896-y.


Kinetically-derived maximal dose (KMD) confirms lack of human relevance for high-dose effects of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4).

Borgert C, Burgoon L, Fuentes C Arch Toxicol. 2025; 99(2):611-621.

PMID: 39799522 PMC: 11774993. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03914-z.


Endogenous hormones matters in evaluation of endocrine disruptive effects mediated by nuclear receptors.

Zhao Y, Fent K Eco Environ Health. 2024; 3(3):257-259.

PMID: 39220231 PMC: 11364016. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.04.006.


Flavouring Group Evaluation 413 (FGE.413): Naringenin.

Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Degen G, Engel K, Fowler P EFSA J. 2024; 22(5):e8747.

PMID: 38751504 PMC: 11094580. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8747.


Thresholds of adversity for endocrine disrupting substances: a conceptual case study.

Choi J, Rotter S, Ritz V, Kneuer C, Marx-Stoelting P, Marzo Solano M Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98(7):2019-2045.

PMID: 38704806 PMC: 11168997. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03748-9.


References
1.
Jefferson W, Padilla-Banks E, Clark G, Newbold R . Assessing estrogenic activity of phytochemicals using transcriptional activation and immature mouse uterotrophic responses. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002; 777(1-2):179-89. DOI: 10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00493-2. View

2.
Boomsma C, Kavelaars A, Eijkemans M, Amarouchi K, Teklenburg G, Gutknecht D . Cytokine profiling in endometrial secretions: a non-invasive window on endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18(1):85-94. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60429-4. View

3.
Watson C, Jeng Y, Kochukov M . Nongenomic actions of estradiol compared with estrone and estriol in pituitary tumor cell signaling and proliferation. FASEB J. 2008; 22(9):3328-36. PMC: 2518256. DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-107672. View

4.
Borgert C, LaKind J, Witorsch R . A critical review of methods for comparing estrogenic activity of endogenous and exogenous chemicals in human milk and infant formula. Environ Health Perspect. 2003; 111(8):1020-36. PMC: 1241552. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6023. View

5.
De Angelis M, Stossi F, Waibel M, Katzenellenbogen B, Katzenellenbogen J . Isocoumarins as estrogen receptor beta selective ligands: Isomers of isoflavone phytoestrogens and their metabolites. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005; 13(23):6529-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.07.014. View