Diet Affects Muscle Quality and Growth Traits of Grass Carp (): A Comparison Between Grass and Artificial Feed
Overview
Affiliations
Fish muscle, the main edible parts with high protein level and low fat level, is consumed worldwide. Diet contributes greatly to fish growth performance and muscle quality. In order to elucidate the correlation between diet and muscle quality, the same batch of juvenile grass carp () were divided into two groups and fed with either grass ( and ) or artificial feed, respectively. However, the different two diets didn't result in significant differences in all the detected water quality parameters (e.g., Tm, pH, DO, NH/[Formula: see text]-N, [Formula: see text]-N, [Formula: see text], TN, TP, and TOC) between the two experimental groups. After a 4-month culture period, various indexes and expression of myogenic regulatory factor (MRFs) and their related genes were tested. The weight gain of the fish fed with artificial feed (AFG) was nearly 40% higher than the fish fed with grass (GFG). Significantly higher alkaline phosphatase, total cholestrol, high density cholestrol and total protein were detected in GFG as compared to AFG. GFG also showed increased hardness, resilience and shear force in texture profile analysis, with significantly bigger and compact muscle fibers in histologic slices. The fat accumulation was most serious in the abdomen muscle of AFG. Additionally, the expression levels of -, and were higher, whereas -, and -2 were lower in most positional muscles of GFG as compared to AFG. Overall, these results suggested that feeding grass could promote muscle growth and development by stimulating muscle fiber hypertrophy, as well as significantly enhance the expression of s. Feeding with grass could also improve flesh quality by improving muscle characteristics, enhancing the production of collagen, meanthile, reducing fat accumulation and moisture in muscle, but at the cost of a slower growth.
Resolving ecological drivers of temporal variations of β-diversity across intertidal microbiomes.
Liu X, Gong X, Ma K, Song W, Zhou J, Wang M ISME Commun. 2025; 5(1):ycaf025.
PMID: 40041707 PMC: 11879246. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycaf025.
Siddik M, Francis P, Foysal M, Francis D Front Immunol. 2024; 15():1471261.
PMID: 39640260 PMC: 11617724. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1471261.
Cheng Z, Huang H, Qiao G, Wang Y, Wang X, Yue Y Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(18).
PMID: 39335279 PMC: 11428853. DOI: 10.3390/ani14182690.
Yang H, Yuan Q, Rahman M, Lv W, Huang W, Hu W Foods. 2024; 13(11).
PMID: 38890979 PMC: 11171622. DOI: 10.3390/foods13111751.
Tonissen K, Franz G, Albrecht E, Lutze P, Bochert R, Grunow B Fish Physiol Biochem. 2024; 50(4):1527-1544.
PMID: 38733450 PMC: 11286731. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-024-01354-1.