» Articles » PMID: 29630722

Too Much of a Good Thing: How Novelty Biases and Vocabulary Influence Known and Novel Referent Selection in 18-Month-Old Children and Associative Learning Models

Overview
Journal Cogn Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2018 Apr 10
PMID 29630722
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying the referent of novel words is a complex process that young children do with relative ease. When given multiple objects along with a novel word, children select the most novel item, sometimes retaining the word-referent link. Prior work is inconsistent, however, on the role of object novelty. Two experiments examine 18-month-old children's performance on referent selection and retention with novel and known words. The results reveal a pervasive novelty bias on referent selection with both known and novel names and, across individual children, a negative correlation between attention to novelty and retention of new word-referent links. A computational model examines possible sources of the bias, suggesting novelty supports in-the-moment behavior but not retention. Together, results suggest that when lexical knowledge is weak, attention to novelty drives behavior, but alone does not sustain learning. Importantly, the results demonstrate that word learning may be driven, in part, by low-level perceptual processes.

Citing Articles

Can Infants Retain Statistically Segmented Words and Mappings Across a Delay?.

Karaman F, Lany J, Hay J Cogn Sci. 2024; 48(3):e13433.

PMID: 38528792 PMC: 10977659. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13433.


Formal theories clarify the complex: Generalizing a neural process account of the interaction of visual exploration and word learning in infancy.

Bhat A, Samuelson L, Spencer J Child Dev. 2023; 94(6):1491-1510.

PMID: 37902088 PMC: 10843287. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.14023.


Attention to novelty interferes with toddlers' emerging memory decision-making.

Leckey S, Bhagath S, Johnson E, Ghetti S Child Dev. 2023; 95(1):98-113.

PMID: 37409734 PMC: 10770300. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13959.


Coordination of Caregiver Naming and Children's Exploration of Solid Objects and Nonsolid Substances.

Perry L, Custode S, Fasano R, Gonzalez B, Valtierra A Front Psychol. 2022; 13:945664.

PMID: 35865677 PMC: 9294728. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.945664.


Research on Feature Extraction and Chinese Translation Method of Internet-of-Things English Terminology.

Li H Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:6344571.

PMID: 35528369 PMC: 9071986. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6344571.


References
1.
Diesendruck G, Markson L . Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account. Dev Psychol. 2001; 37(5):630-41. View

2.
HUTTENLOCHER P, Dabholkar A . Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1997; 387(2):167-78. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-z. View

3.
Fitneva S, Christiansen M . Looking in the wrong direction correlates with more accurate word learning. Cogn Sci. 2011; 35(2):367-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01156.x. View

4.
Borovsky A, Ellis E, Evans J, Elman J . Lexical leverage: category knowledge boosts real-time novel word recognition in 2-year-olds. Dev Sci. 2015; 19(6):918-932. PMC: 4826629. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12343. View

5.
Smith L, Yu C . Visual attention is not enough: Individual differences in statistical word-referent learning in infants. Lang Learn Dev. 2014; 9(1). PMC: 3882028. DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2012.707104. View