Computed Tomography Profile and Its Utilization in Head Injury Patients in Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study

Overview

Journal J Emerg Trauma Shock

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2018 Apr 10

PMID 29628665

Citations 4

Authors

Archana Waganekar

Jagadish Sadasivan

A Sathia Prabhu

K T Harichandrakumar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Context: Based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), head injury can be classified as minor (GCS 13-15), moderate (GCS 9-12), and severe (GCS 3-8). There is a lot of controversy in the use of computed tomography (CT) in head injury patients.

Aims: This study was intended to estimate the rate of CT positivity in head injury patients and to define the criteria for doing CT in head injury patients.

Settings And Design: This was a prospective observational study in the emergency department (ED) over a 12-month period. Subjects and.

Methods: Study involved all head injury patients attending ED. Risk factors studied were a loss of consciousness (LOC), vomiting, seizures, ear bleed, nosebleed, external injuries, and alcohol intoxication.

Statistical Analysis Used: Comparison of CT positivity with the patient's demographics and clinical characteristics was carried out using Chi-square.

Results: A total of 1782 patients were included in this study. Overall CT positivity was 50.9%. In minor head injury (MHI), CT positivity rate was 38%. The study showed significant association of CT positivity with five variables: LOC >5 min, vomiting, seizures, ear bleed, and nosebleed.

Conclusions: From the study, we recommend following: CT is indicated in all patients with moderate and severe head injury (GCS ≤12). Low threshold for taking CT is advisable in elderly and alcohol-intoxicated patients. In MHI, CT is indicated if any one of the following risk factors are present: LOC >5 min, history of vomiting, history of seizures, history of ear bleed, and history of nosebleed.

Citing Articles

A comparison of performance between a deep learning model with residents for localization and classification of intracranial hemorrhage.

Angkurawaranon S, Sanorsieng N, Unsrisong K, Inkeaw P, Sripan P, Khumrin P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9975.

PMID: 37340038 PMC: 10282020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37114-z.

Examining four blood biomarkers for the detection of acute intracranial abnormalities following mild traumatic brain injury in older adults.

Iverson G, Minkkinen M, Karr J, Berghem K, Zetterberg H, Blennow K Front Neurol. 2022; 13:960741.

PMID: 36484020 PMC: 9723459. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.960741.

Computed Tomographic Imaging Appraisal of Traumatic Brain Injury in a Tertiary Hospital in South-South Nigeria: A 6-Year Review.

Uduma F, Okere P, Ekpene U, Nottidge T Niger Med J. 2021; 61(5):252-256.

PMID: 33487848 PMC: 7808284. DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_10_20.

Whats New in Emergencies, Trauma and Shock? Computed Tomography Profile and its Utilization in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Agrawal A, Moscote-Salazar L J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018; 11(1):1.

PMID: 29628660 PMC: 5852908. DOI: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_125_17.

References

Saadat S, Ghodsi S, Holakouie Naieni K, Firouznia K, Hosseini M, Kadkhodaie H . Prediction of intracranial computed tomography findings in patients with minor head injury by using logistic regression. J Neurosurg. 2009; 111(4):688-94. DOI: 10.3171/2009.2.JNS08909. View

Dunning J, Batchelor J, Stratford-Smith P, Teece S, Browne J, Sharpin C . A meta-analysis of variables that predict significant intracranial injury in minor head trauma. Arch Dis Child. 2004; 89(7):653-9. PMC: 1719991. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.027722. View

Mata-Mbemba D, Mugikura S, Nakagawa A, Murata T, Kato Y, Tatewaki Y . Canadian CT head rule and New Orleans Criteria in mild traumatic brain injury: comparison at a tertiary referral hospital in Japan. Springerplus. 2016; 5:176. PMC: 4766169. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1781-9. View

Borczuk P . Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 25(6):731-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70199-0. View

Thiruppathy S, Muthukumar N . Mild head injury: revisited. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005; 146(10):1075-82. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-004-0335-z. View

Sharif-Alhoseini M, Khodadadi H, Chardoli M, Rahimi-Movaghar V . Indications for brain computed tomography scan after minor head injury. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011; 4(4):472-6. PMC: 3214503. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.86631. View

Toyama Y, Kobayashi T, Nishiyama Y, Satoh K, Ohkawa M, Seki K . CT for acute stage of closed head injury. Radiat Med. 2005; 23(5):309-16. View

Nayebaghayee H, Afsharian T . Correlation between Glasgow Coma Scale and brain computed tomography-scan findings in head trauma patients. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016; 11(1):46-9. PMC: 4732242. DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.165780. View

Cassidy J, Carroll L, Peloso P, Borg J, Von Holst H, Holm L . Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004; (43 Suppl):28-60. DOI: 10.1080/16501960410023732. View

10.

Gururaj G . Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario. Neurol Res. 2002; 24(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1179/016164102101199503. View

11.

Hyder A, Wunderlich C, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye O . The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007; 22(5):341-53. View

12.

Chen C, Lou Y, Chu C, Lin H, Lee W, Ma K . Less is more? The impact of trauma volume on the positive rate of head computed tomography scans in head trauma patients. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012; 2012:340317. PMC: 3385619. DOI: 10.1100/2012/340317. View

13.

Inamasu J, Hori S, Aoki K, Suga S, Kawase T, Aikawa N . CT scans essential after posttraumatic loss of consciousness. Am J Emerg Med. 2000; 18(7):810-1. DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2000.18111. View

14.

Dearden N . Mechanisms and prevention of secondary brain damage during intensive care. Clin Neuropathol. 1998; 17(4):221-8. View

15.

Sharma B, Bradbury C, Mikulis D, Green R . Missed diagnosis of traumatic brain injury in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2014; 46(4):370-3. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1261. View

16.

Munivenkatappa A, Deepika A, Prathyusha V, Devi I, Shukla D . Can an abnormal CT scan be predicted from common symptoms after mild head injury in children?. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2014; 8(3):183-7. PMC: 3888031. DOI: 10.4103/1817-1745.123659. View

17.

Hofman P, Nelemans P, Kemerink G, Wilmink J . Value of radiological diagnosis of skull fracture in the management of mild head injury: meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 68(4):416-22. PMC: 1736859. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.68.4.416. View

18.

Gaetz M . The neurophysiology of brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(1):4-18. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00258-x. View

19.

Walleck C . Preventing secondary brain injury. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1992; 3(1):19-30. DOI: 10.4037/15597768-1992-1003. View

20.

Schynoll W, Overton D, Krome R, Wesolowski D, Wang A, Wilson A . A prospective study to identify high-yield criteria associated with acute intracranial computed tomography findings in head-injured patients. Am J Emerg Med. 1993; 11(4):321-6. DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(93)90160-d. View