» Articles » PMID: 29627874

Meningiomas: Skull Base Versus Non-skull Base

Overview
Journal Neurosurg Rev
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2018 Apr 9
PMID 29627874
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To identify differences between skull base meningiomas (SBM) and non-skull base meningiomas (NSBM). All adult patients (18.0-69.9 years) operated for intracranial meningiomas between 1990 and 2010 at our institution were investigated. Al-Mefty's definition was used to dichotomize tumors into SBM and NSBM. Overall, 1148 consecutive patients were identified. Median age at surgery was 54.2 years [18.1-69.9]. Median follow-up was 7.4 years [0.0-20.9]. There were 562 patients (49%) with SBM and 586 (51%) with NSBM. The two groups were similar with respect to patient age, follow-up time, and number of patients. Overall female-to-male ratio was 2.6:1, but 3.2:1 in SBM and 2.2:1 in NSBM (p < 0.005). With respect to presenting symptoms, SBMs had more often neurological deficits (risk ratio (RR) 1.4; p < 0.0001) and less often seizures (RR 0.4; p < 0.0001). Gross total resections were less frequent in SBM than NSBM (62 vs 84%) (RR 1.3; p < 0.0001). SBMs had a lower risk of WHO grades II and III histology (4.5 vs 9.5%) (RR 0.5; p < 0.001). Worsening of neurological function was more frequent in SBM (21 vs 121%) (RR 1.8; p < 0.001). Retreatment-free survival at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, was 80, 70, and 62% for SBM versus 90, 82, and 74% for NSBM (p < 0.0001). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, was 93, 85, and 78% for SBM and 96, 91, and 79% for NSBM (p = 0.14). Patients with SBMs had more new-onset neurological deficits and significantly shorter retreatment-free survivals, but this did not adversely affect the overall survival.

Citing Articles

Determinants of quality of life following resection of skull base tumors: a systematic review.

Sperl V, Rhomberg T, Kretschmer T Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1473261.

PMID: 39759154 PMC: 11696366. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1473261.


Endonasal Route for Tuberculum and Planum Meningiomas.

Cavallo L, DAvella E, Tortora F, Bove I, Cappabianca P, Solari D Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2024; 53:65-78.

PMID: 39287803 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-67077-0_5.


Intraoperative tranexamic acid administration in cranial meningioma surgery: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trials.

Vychopen M, Arlt F, Guresir E, Wach J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1464671.

PMID: 39267835 PMC: 11390351. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1464671.


The Impact of Molecular and Genetic Analysis on the Treatment of Patients with Atypical Meningiomas.

Ravnik J, Rowbottom H Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(16).

PMID: 39202270 PMC: 11353905. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161782.


The safety and use of perioperative dexamethasone in the perioperative management of primary sporadic supratentorial meningiomas.

Arlt F, Basaran A, Vogel M, Vychopen M, Seidel C, Barrantes-Freer A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1379692.

PMID: 38715788 PMC: 11074443. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1379692.


References
1.
Simpson D . The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1957; 20(1):22-39. PMC: 497230. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.22. View

2.
Whittle I, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D . Meningiomas. Lancet. 2004; 363(9420):1535-43. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16153-9. View

3.
Curry W, McDermott M, Carter B, Barker 2nd F . Craniotomy for meningioma in the United States between 1988 and 2000: decreasing rate of mortality and the effect of provider caseload. J Neurosurg. 2005; 102(6):977-86. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.0977. View

4.
Modha A, Gutin P . Diagnosis and treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: a review. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57(3):538-50. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000170980.47582.a5. View

5.
Kasuya H, Kubo O, Tanaka M, Amano K, Kato K, Hori T . Clinical and radiological features related to the growth potential of meningioma. Neurosurg Rev. 2006; 29(4):293-6. PMC: 1564192. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-006-0039-3. View