» Articles » PMID: 29627608

Effect of Wheelchair Stroke Pattern on Upper Extremity Muscle Fatigue

Overview
Journal PM R
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Apr 9
PMID 29627608
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Shoulder dysfunction is common in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) with an incidence of up to 63%. Dysfunction is a result of muscle imbalances, specifically denervated rotator cuff muscles that are repetitively used during manual wheelchair propulsion.

Objective: To determine which arm stroke technique, pump (P) or semicircular (SC), is most energy efficient for long periods of propulsion.

Design: A randomized study with repeated measures observations.

Setting: The study was performed at an institutional gait analysis laboratory.

Participants: 18 able-bodied (AB) male participants were studied and randomized into one of 2 conditions, SC or P.

Methods: Shoulder muscle fatigue was measured by changes in Borg CR10 Rate of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE) and upper extremity strength via a handheld dynamometer. Participants were studied and assigned into one of 2 conditions of wheelchair arm propulsion patterns, SC or P group, and propelled on a wheelchair treadmill for 10 minutes.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes included recordings of Borg RPE scale during continuous wheelchair propulsion and pre- and post-test dynamometer testing means for bilateral elbow and shoulder extension. Analysis of covariance, t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used in analyzing data.

Results: Although not significant (P = .23), the Borg RPE scores for the SC condition were consistently higher than the scores for the P condition. In addition, the dynamometer pre- and post-test readings demonstrated a larger decrease for the SC condition participants than for the P condition participants, but were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that the SC wheelchair propulsion pattern appears to be more fatiguing to shoulder muscles than the P propulsion pattern. However, more data would need to be collected to find a significant difference.

Level Of Evidence: II.

References
1.
Ambrosio F, Boninger M, Souza A, Fitzgerald S, Koontz A, Cooper R . Biomechanics and strength of manual wheelchair users. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006; 28(5):407-14. PMC: 1808266. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2005.11753840. View

2.
Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I . IPAQ interview version: convergent validity with accelerometers and comparison of physical activity and sedentary time levels with the self-administered version. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014; 55(7-8):776-86. View

3.
Lal S . Premature degenerative shoulder changes in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36(3):186-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100608. View

4.
Dellabiancia F, Porcellini G, Merolla G . Instruments and techniques for the analysis of wheelchair propulsion and upper extremity involvement in patients with spinal cord injuries: current concept review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013; 3(3):150-6. PMC: 3838323. View

5.
Subbarao J, Klopfstein J, TURPIN R . Prevalence and impact of wrist and shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 1995; 18(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.1995.11719374. View