» Articles » PMID: 29626557

Response to Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes Among Smokers Differing in Tobacco Dependence Severity

Abstract

This study examines whether tobacco dependence severity moderates the acute effects of reducing nicotine content in cigarettes on the addiction potential of smoking, craving/withdrawal, or smoking topography. Participants (N = 169) were daily smokers with mild, moderate, or high tobacco-dependence severity using the Heaviness of Smoking Index. Following brief abstinence, participants smoked research cigarettes varying in nicotine content (0.4, 2.4, 5.2, 15.8 mg nicotine/g tobacco) in a within-subject design. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of co-variance. No main effects of dependence severity or interactions with nicotine dose were noted in relative reinforcing effects in concurrent choice testing or subjective effects on the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire. Demand for smoking in the Cigarette Purchase Task was greater among more dependent smokers, but reducing nicotine content decreased demand independent of dependence severity. Dependence severity did not significantly alter response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes on the Minnesota Tobacco Withdrawal Scale nor Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-brief (QSU) Factor-2 scale; dependence severity and dose interacted significantly on the QSU-brief Factor-1 scale, with reductions dependent on dose among highly but not mildly or moderately dependent smokers. Dependence severity and dose interacted significantly on only one of six measures of smoking topography (i.e., maximum flow rate), which increased as dose increased among mildly and moderately but not highly dependent smokers. These results suggest that dependence severity has no moderating influence on the ability of reduced nicotine content cigarettes to lower the addiction potential of smoking, and minimal effects on relief from craving/withdrawal or smoking topography.

Citing Articles

Personalized and adaptive interventions for smoking cessation: Emerging trends and determinants of efficacy.

Cohen G, Bellanca C, Bernardini R, Rose J, Polosa R iScience. 2024; 27(11):111090.

PMID: 39620129 PMC: 11607540. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111090.


Modulation of High-Frequency rTMS on Reward Circuitry in Individuals with Nicotine Dependence: A Preliminary fMRI Study.

Wang T, Li R, Chen D, Xie M, Li Z, Mao H Neural Plast. 2024; 2024:5673579.

PMID: 39234068 PMC: 11374416. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5673579.


Combining app-based behavioral therapy with electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a study protocol for a single-arm mixed-methods pilot trial.

Schiek H, Esch T, Michaelsen M, Hoetger C Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):52.

PMID: 38987840 PMC: 11234631. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00483-5.


The Impact of Three Alternate Nicotine-Delivery Products on Combusted Cigarette Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Piper M, Schlam T, Donny E, Kobinsky K, Matthews J, Piasecki T Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 27(2):317-325.

PMID: 38348917 PMC: 11750741. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae014.


Effect of nicotine expectancy and nicotine dose reduction on cigarette demand, withdrawal alleviation, and puff topography.

Strickland J, Gelino B, Naude G, Harbaugh J, Schlitzer R, Mercincavage M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023; 254:111042.

PMID: 38086213 PMC: 10872246. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111042.


References
1.
Jacobs E, Bickel W . Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999; 7(4):412-26. DOI: 10.1037//1064-1297.7.4.412. View

2.
Cox L, Tiffany S, Christen A . Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001; 3(1):7-16. DOI: 10.1080/14622200020032051. View

3.
Sigmon S, Tidey J, Badger G, Higgins S . Acute effects of D-amphetamine on progressive-ratio performance maintained by cigarette smoking and money. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 167(4):393-402. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1416-z. View

4.
Lee E, Malson J, Waters A, Moolchan E, Pickworth W . Smoking topography: reliability and validity in dependent smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003; 5(5):673-9. DOI: 10.1080/1462220031000158645. View

5.
Johnson M, Bickel W, Kirshenbaum A . Substitutes for tobacco smoking: a behavioral economic analysis of nicotine gum, denicotinized cigarettes, and nicotine-containing cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 74(3):253-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.12.012. View