» Articles » PMID: 29626368

Patient-centred Value Framework for Haemophilia

Overview
Journal Haemophilia
Specialty Hematology
Date 2018 Apr 8
PMID 29626368
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Growing budgetary demands have led to increased scrutiny of healthcare spending for rare diseases, leading to a unified goal within the haemophilia community to define objectively patient-centred value in haemophilia care.

Aim: To develop a patient-centred outcomes framework with global applicability for assessing value in haemophilia healthcare.

Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to identify the range of patient impacts of haemophilia health care and organize these into a three-tiered, patient-centred outcomes framework based on Porter's model for assessing value.

Results: In addition to measures common to other chronic diseases (eg survival and quality of life), Tier 1, health status achieved or retained, includes haemophilia-specific outcomes of bleeding frequency, musculoskeletal complications and life-threatening bleeds, as well as measures of function or activity. Tier 2, process of recovery, includes such outcomes as time to initial treatment, time to recovery and time missed at education/work; also included are disutility of care, measured by inhibitor development, pathogen transmission/infections, orthopaedic intervention and difficult venous access. Tier 3, sustainability of health, is measured by bleed avoidance, maintenance of productive lives and good health over time; potential long-term negative consequences include insufficient or inappropriate therapy and age-related complications. The applicability of the outcomes framework for different types of haemophilia healthcare interventions is described.

Conclusion: Haemophilia health care can affect multiple patient-centred outcomes across diverse patient types and healthcare systems. This framework organizes those outcomes for informing value-based decision making by multiple stakeholders and provides the basis for further refinement and development of a standardized outcomes set.

Citing Articles

Application of a Value Framework to Determine the Value of Prophylaxis Versus On-Demand Treatment in Adults with Hemophilia A in China.

Tan B, Lin A, Han R, Bai L, Sun J, Hu S Adv Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 40016439 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03131-9.


Patient-relevant health outcomes for von Willebrand disease, platelet function disorders, and rare bleeding disorders: a Delphi study.

van Hoorn E, Lingsma H, Cnossen M, Gouw S Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023; 7(7):102201.

PMID: 37854454 PMC: 10579528. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102201.


Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities to transform the care of people with hemophilia.

Tran D, Benson C, Boice J, Chitlur M, Dunn A, Escobar M Expert Rev Hematol. 2023; 16(sup1):19-37.

PMID: 36920859 PMC: 10020869. DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2171981.


Building the blueprint: Formulating a community-generated national plan for future research in inherited bleeding disorders.

Valentino L, Witkop M, Santaella M, DiMichele D, Recht M Haemophilia. 2022; 28(5):760-768.

PMID: 35700441 PMC: 9546016. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14588.


Differential humanistic and economic burden of mild, moderate and severe haemophilia in european adults: a regression analysis of the CHESS II study.

Rodriguez-Santana I, DasMahapatra P, Burke T, Hakimi Z, Bartelt-Hofer J, Nazir J Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022; 17(1):148.

PMID: 35379282 PMC: 8981861. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02300-1.