» Articles » PMID: 29621804

A Multiyear Population-Based Study of Kindergarten Language Screening Failure Rates Using the Rice Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment

Overview
Date 2018 Apr 6
PMID 29621804
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, over 2 separate school years, the school-district-wide failure rate of kindergartners on a screener of grammatical tense marking-the Rice Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment (TEGI) Screening Test (Rice & Wexler, 2001)-composed of past tense (PT) and third-person singular (3S) probes.

Method: In the fall of 2 consecutive school years, consented and eligible kindergartners (n = 148 in Year 1, n = 126 in Year 2) in a rural southern school district were administered the TEGI Screening Test. Children who failed the screening test or either of the individual probes (PT or 3S) were administered the Primary Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. All children also completed the Test of Articulation Performance-Screen (Bryant & Bryant, 1983) and, in Year 2, the Get Ready to Read! emergent literacy screener (Whitehurst & Lonigan, 2001).

Results: The screening tool outcome most closely and consistently aligned with the recommended failure rate of approximately 30% (Oetting, Gregory, & Rivière, 2016; based on Tomblin et al., 1997) was the TEGI PT probe. TEGI Screening Test and 3S probe failure rates fell below the recommended level. Most children who failed the PT probe demonstrated nonverbal intelligence skills within the average range. In addition, most children who failed the PT probe would not have been readily identified on the basis of only the results of their articulation or emergent literacy screenings.

Conclusions: The TEGI PT probe is an efficient and reliable screener that identifies children for monitoring or additional language assessment. Children with language vulnerabilities are not necessarily identified by articulation or emergent literacy screenings at entry to kindergarten. To identify children at risk for language impairment, it is therefore necessary to directly screen oral language.

Citing Articles

Innovative Family-Based Genetically Informed Series of Analyses of Whole-Exome Data Supports Likely Inheritance for Grammar in Children with Specific Language Impairment.

Andres E, Earnest K, Xuan H, Zhong C, Rice M, Raza M Children (Basel). 2023; 10(7).

PMID: 37508616 PMC: 10378399. DOI: 10.3390/children10071119.


Using Motor Tempi to Understand Rhythm and Grammatical Skills in Developmental Language Disorder and Typical Language Development.

Ladanyi E, Novakovic M, Boorom O, Aaron A, Scartozzi A, Gustavson D Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023; 4(1):1-28.

PMID: 36875176 PMC: 9979588. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00082.


Comparison of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-Screening Test Risk Subtest to Two Other Screeners for Low-Income Prekindergartners Who Speak African American English and Live in the Urban South.

Moland C, Oetting J Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021; 30(6):2528-2541.

PMID: 34582275 PMC: 9132032. DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00270.


Tense Marking in the Kindergarten Population: Testing the Bimodal Distribution Hypothesis.

Weiler B, Schuele C J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64(2):593-612.

PMID: 33529048 PMC: 9150687. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00335.


Specific Language Impairment in African American English and Southern White English: Measures of Tense and Agreement With Dialect-Informed Probes and Strategic Scoring.

Oetting J, Berry J, Gregory K, Riviere A, McDonald J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(9):3443-3461.

PMID: 31525131 PMC: 6808338. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0089.