» Articles » PMID: 29618351

Hospitalization Outcomes in Patients with Schizophrenia After Switching to Lurasidone or Quetiapine: a US Claims Database Analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2018 Apr 6
PMID 29618351
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study compared hospital admission rates among adult patients with schizophrenia who switched to antipsychotic monotherapy with lurasidone or quetiapine.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used U.S.-based Truven Health MarketScan® Medicaid Multi-State Database (April 2010 through December 2012) and MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (April 2010 through October 2013). Continuous enrollment for 6-months before and after medication initiation was required. Treatment episodes ended after 6-months post lurasidone or quetiapine initiation, a 60-day treatment gap, or initiation of another antipsychotic. Length of treatment episodes (i.e., treatment duration) was compared using a t-test. All-cause, mental-health, and schizophrenia-related hospitalization rates, as well as costs, were compared between lurasidone- and quetiapine-treated patients using multivariable generalized linear models that adjusted for background characteristics.

Results: Quetiapine (n = 435) compared to lurasidone (n = 238) treatment was associated with increased all-cause (21% vs 13%, p < 0.05) and mental health-related hospitalizations (20% vs 12%, p < 0.05), but similar rates of schizophrenia-related hospitalizations (14% vs. 10%, p = 0.14). After adjusting for baseline covariates, quetiapine had 64% higher likelihood of all-cause hospitalizations (OR [odds ratio] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.57, p = 0.03), 74% higher likelihood of mental health-related hospitalizations (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.11-2.75, p = 0.02), and a similar likelihood of schizophrenia-related hospitalization (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.82-2.22, p = 0.24). For those with hospital admissions, adjusted all-cause admission costs were higher for quetiapine when compared with lurasidone in both the Medicaid ($22,036 vs. $15,424, p = 0.17) and commercial populations ($23,490 vs. $20,049, p = 0.61). These differences were not significant. The length of treatment episodes was significantly shorter for quetiapine than lurasidone (115.4 vs 123.1 days, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In this retrospective claims database study, patients with schizophrenia who were switched to lurasidone had significantly fewer all-cause and mental health-related hospitalizations and similar rates of schizophrenia-related hospitalization compared with those switched to quetiapine. Patients switching to lurasidone had a significantly longer treatment duration rate than those switching to quetiapine. These results may reflect differences in efficacy or tolerability between lurasidone and quetiapine.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the real-world effectiveness and economic and humanistic outcomes of selected oral antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia in the United States: Updating the evidence and gaps.

Jeun K, Kamal K, Adhikari K, Nolfi D, Ashraf M, Zacker C J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024; 30(2):183-199.

PMID: 38308625 PMC: 10839461. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.183.


Investigating the Effect of Adherence to Antipsychotic Therapy on the Length of Stay and Number of Hospitalizations in Patients with Schizophrenia - A Descriptive Analysis.

Barliana M, Ramdini D, Afifah N, Alfian S, Sumiwi S Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023; 17:2737-2747.

PMID: 37936717 PMC: 10625877. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S430083.


Lurasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in adult and paediatric populations.

Guilera T, Chart Pascual J, Blasco M, Calvo Estopinan P, Piernas Gonzalez R, Ramirez Martinez I Drugs Context. 2023; 12.

PMID: 36793449 PMC: 9914098. DOI: 10.7573/dic.2022-10-1.

References
1.
Tunis S, Ascher-Svanum H, Stensland M, Kinon B . Assessing the value of antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia: the importance of evaluating and interpreting the clinical significance of individual service costs. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22(1):1-8. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422010-00001. View

2.
Fitch K, Iwasaki K, Villa K . Resource utilization and cost in a commercially insured population with schizophrenia. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2014; 7(1):18-26. PMC: 4031739. View

3.
Markowitz M, Karve S, Panish J, Candrilli S, Alphs L . Antipsychotic adherence patterns and health care utilization and costs among patients discharged after a schizophrenia-related hospitalization. BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13:246. PMC: 3853885. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-246. View

4.
Loebel A, Cucchiaro J, Xu J, Sarma K, Pikalov A, Kane J . Effectiveness of lurasidone vs. quetiapine XR for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a 12-month, double-blind, noninferiority study. Schizophr Res. 2013; 147(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.03.013. View

5.
Mihaylova B, Briggs A, OHagan A, Thompson S . Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs. Health Econ. 2010; 20(8):897-916. PMC: 3470917. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1653. View