» Articles » PMID: 29617831

Leaf Dorsoventrality As a Paramount Factor Determining Spectral Performance in Field-grown Wheat Under Contrasting Water Regimes

Overview
Journal J Exp Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Apr 5
PMID 29617831
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of leaf dorsoventrality and its interaction with environmentally induced changes in the leaf spectral response are still poorly understood, particularly for isobilateral leaves. We investigated the spectral performance of 24 genotypes of field-grown durum wheat at two locations under both rainfed and irrigated conditions. Flag leaf reflectance spectra in the VIS-NIR-SWIR (visible-near-infrared-short-wave infrared) regions were recorded in the adaxial and abaxial leaf sides and at the canopy level, while traits providing information on water status and grain yield were evaluated. Moreover, leaf anatomical parameters were measured in a subset of five genotypes. The spectral traits studied were more affected by the leaf side than by the water regime. Leaf dorsoventral differences suggested higher accessory pigment content in the abaxial leaf side, while water regime differences were related to increased chlorophyll, nitrogen, and water contents in the leaves in the irrigated treatment. These variations were associated with anatomical changes. Additionally, leaf dorsoventral differences were less in the rainfed treatment, suggesting the existence of leaf-side-specific responses at the anatomical and biochemical level. Finally, the accuracy in yield prediction was enhanced when abaxial leaf spectra were employed. We concluded that the importance of dorsoventrality in spectral traits is paramount, even in isobilateral leaves.

Citing Articles

What to Choose for Estimating Leaf Water Status-Spectral Reflectance or In vivo Chlorophyll Fluorescence?.

Spundova M, Kucerova Z, Nozkova V, Opatikova M, Prochazkova L, Klimes P Plant Phenomics. 2024; 6:0243.

PMID: 39211292 PMC: 11358408. DOI: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0243.

References
1.
Izanloo A, Condon A, Langridge P, Tester M, Schnurbusch T . Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59(12):3327-46. PMC: 2529232. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern199. View

2.
Gitelson A, Merzlyak M, Chivkunova O . Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves. Photochem Photobiol. 2001; 74(1):38-45. DOI: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0038:opaneo>2.0.co;2. View

3.
Ollinger S . Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. New Phytol. 2010; 189(2):375-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03536.x. View

4.
Johnson D, Smith W, Vogelmann T, Brodersen C . Leaf architecture and direction of incident light influence mesophyll fluorescence profiles. Am J Bot. 2011; 92(9):1425-31. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.9.1425. View

5.
Willick I, Lahlali R, Vijayan P, Muir D, Karunakaran C, Tanino K . Wheat flag leaf epicuticular wax morphology and composition in response to moderate drought stress are revealed by SEM, FTIR-ATR and synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy. Physiol Plant. 2017; 162(3):316-332. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12637. View