» Articles » PMID: 29615443

Postpartum Family Planning Integration with Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Services: a Cross-sectional Analysis of Client Flow Patterns in India and Kenya

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Apr 5
PMID 29615443
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services represent opportunities to integrate postpartum family planning (PPFP). Objectives were to determine levels of MNCH-family planning (FP) integration and associations between integration, client characteristics and service delivery factors in facilities that received programmatic PPFP support.

Design And Setting: Cross-sectional client flow assessment conducted during May-July 2014, over 5 days at 10 purposively selected public sector facilities in India (4 hospitals) and Kenya (2 hospitals and 4 health centres).

Participants: 2158 client visits tracked (1294 India; 864 Kenya). Women aged 18 or older accessing services while pregnant and/or with a child under 2 years.

Interventions: PPFP/postpartum intrauterine device-Bihar, India (2012-2013); Jharkhand, India (2009-2014); Embu, Kenya (2006-2010). Maternal, infant and young child nutrition/FP integration-Bondo, Kenya (2011-2014).

Primary Outcome Measures: Proportion of visits where clients received integrated MNCH-FP services, client characteristics as predictors of MNCH-FP integration and MNCH-FP integration as predictor of length of time spent at facility.

Results: Levels of MNCH-FP integration varied widely across facilities (5.3% to 63.0%), as did proportion of clients receiving MNCH-FP integrated services by service area. Clients travelling 30-59 min were half as likely to receive integrated services versus those travelling under 30 min (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.7, P<0.001). Clients receiving MNCH-FP services (vs MNCH services only) spent an average of 10.5 min longer at the facility (95% CI -0.1 to 21.9, not statistically significant).

Conclusions: Findings suggest importance of focused programmatic support for integration by MNCH service area. FP integration was highest in areas receiving specific support. Integration does not seem to impose an undue burden on clients in terms of time spent at the facility. Clients living furthest from facilities are least likely to receive integrated services.

Citing Articles

The state of postpartum contraceptive use in India: descriptive lessons from nationally representative survey data.

Johns N, Singh A, Ambast S, Bhan N, Hay K, Patwardhan V Reprod Health. 2025; 22(1):39.

PMID: 40075525 PMC: 11905474. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-025-01978-3.


Effect of multiple counselling contacts along the continuum of care on use of postpartum family planning in a cohort of Ethiopian women: a dose-response analysis.

Pfitzer A, Jima G, Sitrin D, Ayalew F, Ahmed S BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e084247.

PMID: 39806635 PMC: 11667413. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084247.


Application of the integrated gateway model on child nutrition behaviors in Niger: An exploratory analysis.

Dougherty L, Dadi C PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0297466.

PMID: 38558005 PMC: 10984541. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297466.


Effect of integrating maternal and child health services, nutrition and family planning services on postpartum family planning uptake at 6 months post-partum in Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire and Niger: a quasi-experimental study protocol.

Kpebo D, Coulibaly A, Yameogo W, Bijou S, Lazoumar R, Tougri H Reprod Health. 2022; 19(1):181.

PMID: 35987637 PMC: 9391637. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01467-x.


Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points.

Krishnaratne S, Hoyt J, Hamon J, Ariko A, Atayo C, Morukileng J BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e054277.

PMID: 35396286 PMC: 8995957. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054277.


References
1.
Mayhew S, Ploubidis G, Sloggett A, Church K, Obure C, Birdthistle I . Innovation in Evaluating the Impact of Integrated Service-Delivery: The Integra Indexes of HIV and Reproductive Health Integration. PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146694. PMC: 4723242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146694. View

2.
Baumgartner J, Green M, Weaver M, Mpangile G, Kohi T, Mujaya S . Integrating family planning services into HIV care and treatment clinics in Tanzania: evaluation of a facilitated referral model. Health Policy Plan. 2013; 29(5):570-9. PMC: 4184336. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czt043. View

3.
Warren C, Mwangi A, Oweya E, Kamunya R, Koskei N . Safeguarding maternal and newborn health: improving the quality of postnatal care in Kenya. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009; 22(1):24-30. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp050. View

4.
Karra M, Fink G, Canning D . Facility distance and child mortality: a multi-country study of health facility access, service utilization, and child health outcomes. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(3):817-826. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw062. View

5.
Blazer C, Prata N . Postpartum family planning: current evidence on successful interventions. Open Access J Contracept. 2018; 7:53-67. PMC: 5683159. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S98817. View