» Articles » PMID: 29614114

Innovative Technologies and Social Inequalities in Health: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Apr 4
PMID 29614114
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically review the range, nature, and extent of current research activity exploring the influence of innovative health-related technologies on social inequalities in health, with specific focus on a deeper understanding of the variables used to measure this connection and the pathways leading to the (re)production of inequalities. A review process was conducted, based on scoping review techniques, searching literature published from January 1, 1996 to November 25, 2016 using MEDLINE, Scopus, and ISI web of science. Search, sorting, and data extraction processes were conducted by a team of researchers and experts using a dynamic, reflexive examination process. Of 4139 studies collected from the search process, a total of 33 were included in the final analysis. Results of this study include the classification of technologies based on how these technologies are accessed and used by end users. In addition to the factors and mechanisms that influence unequal access to technologies, the results of this study highlight the importance of variations in use that importantly shape social inequalities in health. Additionally, focus on health care services technologies must be accompanied by investigating emerging technologies influencing healthy lifestyle, genomics, and personalized devices in health. Findings also suggest that choosing one measure of social position over another has important implications for the interpretation of research results. Furthermore, understanding the pathways through which various innovative health technologies reduce or (re)produce social inequalities in health is context dependent. In order to better understand social inequalities in health, these contextual variations draw attention to the need for critical distinctions between technologies based on how these various technologies are accessed and used. The results of this study provide a comprehensive starting point for future research to further investigate how innovative technologies may influence the unequal distribution of health as a human right.

Citing Articles

Improving Digital Cancer Care for Older Black Adults: Qualitative Study.

Wankah P, Chandra S, Lofters A, Mohamednur N, Osei B, Makuwaza T J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63324.

PMID: 39970422 PMC: 11888062. DOI: 10.2196/63324.


Digital health equity: Crafting sustainable pathways.

Pierce R PLOS Digit Health. 2025; 4(2):e0000703.

PMID: 39903765 PMC: 11793777. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000703.


Support in digital health skill development for vulnerable groups in a public library setting: perspectives of trainers.

Standaar L, Israel A, van der Vaart R, Keij B, Friele R, Beenackers M Front Digit Health. 2025; 6:1519964.

PMID: 39872241 PMC: 11770011. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1519964.


Do community-based digital health inclusion programmes contribute to tackling health inequalities in disadvantaged population groups?: a qualitative study of experiences of a city-wide programme in the North of England.

Poduval S, Arnold L, Carta E, Nimmons D, Stratton I, Shaw M BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):275.

PMID: 39844090 PMC: 11756065. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21418-y.


Mapping the Landscape of Digital Health Intervention Strategies: 25-Year Synthesis.

Liu S, Ma J, Sun M, Zhang C, Gao Y, Xu J J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59027.

PMID: 39804697 PMC: 11773286. DOI: 10.2196/59027.


References
1.
Mackenbach J . The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75(4):761-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.031. View

2.
Ferris T, Kuhlthau K, Ausiello J, Perrin J, Kahn R . Are minority children the last to benefit from a new technology? Technology diffusion and inhaled corticosteriods for asthma. Med Care. 2005; 44(1):81-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000188914.47033.cd. View

3.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View

4.
Tuckson R, Newcomer L, De Sa J . Accessing genomic medicine: affordability, diffusion, and disparities. JAMA. 2013; 309(14):1469-70. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.1468. View

5.
Slade E, Anderson G . The relationship between per capita income and diffusion of medical technologies. Health Policy. 2001; 58(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(01)00151-8. View