» Articles » PMID: 29611371

Visual Recovery After Macular Hole Surgery and Related Prognostic Factors

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2018 Apr 4
PMID 29611371
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the visual recovery and prognostic factors after macular hole surgery.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted. Charts of patients with idiopathic macular holes who underwent surgery by a single surgeon at Severance Hospital between January 1, 2013 and July 31, 2015 were reviewed. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score was recorded preoperatively and at 1 day and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. The variables of age, sex, macular hole size, basal hole diameter, choroidal thickness, and axial length were also noted.

Results: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients were evaluated. Twenty-five patients (96.2%) showed successful macular hole closure after the primary operation. The BCVA stabilized 6 months postoperatively. A large basal hole diameter (p = 0.006) and thin choroid (p = 0.005) were related to poor visual outcomes. Poor preoperative BCVA (p < 0.001) and a thick choroid (p = 0.020) were associated with greater improvement in BCVA after surgery.

Conclusions: Visual acuity stabilized by 6 months after macular hole surgery. Choroidal thickness was a protective factor for final BCVA and visual improvement after the operation.

Citing Articles

The Scottish Retinal Detachment Study: 10-year outcomes after retinal detachment repair.

Hazelwood J, Mitry D, Singh J, Bennett H, Khan A, Goudie C Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39856427 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03613-8.


Predictive relevance of optical coherence tomography indices in conjunction with visual acuity and surgical outcomes of idiopathic macular hole.

Kumar S, Rao G, Sinha N, Rath B, Pattanayak S, Pal A Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39261.

PMID: 39640712 PMC: 11620274. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39261.


Short-term results of surgical treatment in large idiopathic macular hole cases.

Dogruya S, Karabacak D, Altinisik M, Delibay Y, Kayikcioglu O, Kayikcioglu O Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):187.

PMID: 38643432 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03121-w.


Short-Term Clinical Results After ILM Removal and Inverted ILM Flap for Macular Hole Repair - A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.

Michalewicz E, Kuerten D, Djalali-Talab Y, Mazinani B, Walter P, Koutsonas A Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:1605-1618.

PMID: 37304330 PMC: 10257430. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S406134.


Correlations between Visual Performance and Chorioretinal Variables after Vitrectomy for the Idiopathic Macular Hole.

Chen M, Zheng C, Liu Y, Chen F, Xu D, Lu F J Ophthalmol. 2023; 2022:6641956.

PMID: 36620525 PMC: 9812597. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6641956.


References
1.
Chakraborty R, Read S, Collins M . Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure, and ocular biometrics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(8):5121-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7364. View

2.
Aras C, Ocakoglu O, Akova N . Foveolar choroidal blood flow in idiopathic macular hole. Int Ophthalmol. 2005; 25(4):225-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-005-5014-4. View

3.
Landa G, Gentile R, Garcia P, Muldoon T, Rosen R . External limiting membrane and visual outcome in macular hole repair: spectral domain OCT analysis. Eye (Lond). 2011; 26(1):61-9. PMC: 3259578. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.237. View

4.
Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig M, Kampik A . Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(4):390-3. PMC: 1771090. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.390. View

5.
Zeng J, Li J, Liu R, Chen X, Pan J, Tang S . Choroidal thickness in both eyes of patients with unilateral idiopathic macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(11):2328-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.008. View