» Articles » PMID: 29609956

Arcuate Uterus: is There an Impact on in vitro Fertilization Outcomes After euploid Embryo Transfer?

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2018 Apr 4
PMID 29609956
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the impact of the arcuate uterus on euploid blastocyst-stage embryo transfer outcomes after comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS).

Design: Controlled retrospective trial.

Setting: Tertiary care assisted reproduction technology (ART) center.

Patient(s): Consecutive patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and euploid embryo transfer after CCS during 2014.

Intervention(s): Ultrasound examinations and office hysteroscopy; array comparative genomic hybridization to perform CCS after a trophectoderm biopsy.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation and live-birth rates.

Result(s): Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of arcuate uterus. Exclusion criteria were donor oocytes, evidence of other endometrial cavitary abnormalities, prior uterine surgery, and arcuate uterus <4 mm. Group 1 included 78 patients with arcuate uterus of mean depth 5.43 ± 1.81 mm (range: 4-9.5 mm) undergoing 83 transfer cycles. Group 2 included 354 controls undergoing 378 transfer cycles. There were no differences between the groups in baseline characteristics or mean number of euploid embryos transferred. Cycle outcomes were similar between the two groups: rates of implantation (63.7% vs. 65.4%), live birth (68.67% vs. 67.81%), biochemical pregnancy (8.4% vs. 7.65%), and spontaneous abortion (4.8% vs. 4.27%).

Conclusion(s): Arcuate uterus has no impact on ART outcomes after euploid embryo transfer subsequent to CCS, so arcuate uterus should be considered an incidental finding without an indication for surgical resection.

Citing Articles

Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.

Fedele F, Bulfoni A, Parazzini F, Levi-Setti P, Busnelli A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(5):2315-2332.

PMID: 39227392 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07666-0.


Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Caballero Campo M, Perez Milan F, Carrera Roig M, Moratalla Bartolome E, Dominguez Arroyo J, Alcazar Zambrano J Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024; 16(1):9-22.

PMID: 38551471 PMC: 11198883. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004.


Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on reproductive outcomes of IVF/ICSI-embryo transfer: a retrospective study.

Kang J, Qiao J Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):48.

PMID: 38212852 PMC: 10782742. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01544-2.


Increasing Endometrial Thickness Beyond 8 mm Does Not Alter Clinical Pregnancy Rate After Single Euploid Embryo Transfer.

Brodeur T, Hanson B, Maredia N, Tessier K, Esfandiari N, Dahl S Reprod Sci. 2023; 31(4):1045-1052.

PMID: 37957470 PMC: 11015161. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01385-8.


3D transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of uterine septa according to different classifications: are there other measurements that correlate to reproductive outcome in small indentation length?.

Russo C, Conway F, Siciliano T, Selntigia A, Giuseppe Martire F, Soreca G Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022; 14(2):129-138.

PMID: 35781109 PMC: 10191709. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.14.2.025.