Wall Shear Stress Estimation in the Aorta: Impact of Wall Motion, Spatiotemporal Resolution, and Phase Noise
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Wall shear stress (WSS) presents an important parameter for assessing blood flow characteristics and evaluating flow-mediated lesions in the aorta.
Purpose: To investigate the robustness of WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) estimation based on 4D flow MRI against vessel wall motion, spatiotemporal resolution, and velocity encoding (VENC).
Study Type: Simulated and prospective.
Population: Synthetic 4D flow MRI data of the aorta, simulated using the Lattice-Boltzmann method; in vivo 4D flow MRI data of the aorta from healthy volunteers (n = 11) and patients with congenital heart defects (n = 17).
Field Strength/sequence: 1.5T; 4D flow MRI with PEAK-GRAPPA acceleration and prospective electrocardiogram triggering.
Assessment: Predicated upon 3D cubic B-splines interpolation of the image velocity field, WSS was estimated in mid-systole, early-diastole, and late-diastole and OSI was derived. We assessed the impact of spatiotemporal resolution and phase noise, and compared results based on tracked-using deformable registration-and static vessel wall location.
Statistical Tests: Bland-Altman analysis to assess WSS/OSI differences; Hausdorff distance (HD) to assess wall motion; and Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) to assess correlation of HD with WSS.
Results: Synthetic data results show systematic over-/underestimation of WSS when different spatial resolution (mean ± 1.96 SD up to -0.24 ± 0.40 N/m and 0.5 ± 1.38 N/m for 8-fold and 27-fold voxel size, respectively) and VENC-depending phase noise (mean ± 1.96 SD up to 0.31 ± 0.12 N/m and 0.94 ± 0.28 N/m for 2-fold and 4-fold VENC increase, respectively) are given. Neglecting wall motion when defining the vessel wall perturbs WSS estimates to a considerable extent (1.96 SD up to 1.21 N/m ) without systematic over-/underestimation (Bland-Altman mean range -0.06 to 0.05).
Data Conclusion: In addition to sufficient spatial resolution and velocity to noise ratio, accurate tracking of the vessel wall is essential for reliable image-based WSS estimation and should not be neglected if wall motion is present.
Level Of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
El Sayed R, Sharifi A, Park C, Haussen D, Allen J, Oshinski J Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2023; 14(3):476-488.
PMID: 37156900 PMC: 10524741. DOI: 10.1007/s13239-023-00667-1.
Radiomics-based aortic flow profile characterization with 4D phase-contrast MRI.
Huellebrand M, Jarmatz L, Manini C, Laube A, Ivantsits M, Schulz-Menger J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1102502.
PMID: 37077748 PMC: 10106758. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1102502.
Oechtering T, Nowak A, Sieren M, Stroth A, Kirschke N, Wegner F J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):22.
PMID: 36978131 PMC: 10052852. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00921-4.
Aortic wall shear stress in bicuspid aortic valve disease-10-year follow-up.
Hanigk M, Burgstaller E, Latus H, Shehu N, Zimmermann J, Martinoff S Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023; 13(1):38-50.
PMID: 36864959 PMC: 9971286. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-22-477.
Weiss E, Jarvis K, Maroun A, Malaisrie S, Mehta C, McCarthy P J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):3.
PMID: 36698129 PMC: 9878800. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-022-00906-9.