» Articles » PMID: 29604696

Effects of Age on Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in Envelope and Fine Structure, Individually and in Combination

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2018 Apr 2
PMID 29604696
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) in envelope and temporal fine structure (TFS) of amplitude-modulated (AM) tones was assessed for young and older subjects, all with clinically normal hearing at the carrier frequencies of 250 and 500 Hz. Some subjects had hearing loss at higher frequencies. In experiment 1, thresholds for detecting changes in ITD were measured when the ITD was present in the TFS alone (ITD), the envelope alone (ITD), or both (ITD). Thresholds tended to be higher for the older than for the young subjects. ITD thresholds were much higher than ITD thresholds, while ITD thresholds were similar to ITD thresholds. ITD thresholds were lower than ITD thresholds obtained with an unmodulated pure tone, indicating that uninformative AM can improve ITD discrimination. In experiment 2, equally detectable values of ITD and ITD were combined so as to give consistent or inconsistent lateralization. There were large individual differences, but several subjects gave scores that were much higher than would be expected from the optimal combination of independent sources of information, even for the inconsistent condition. It is suggested that ITD and ITD cues are processed partly independently, but that both cues influence lateralization judgments, even when one cue is uninformative.

Citing Articles

The search for correlates of age-related cochlear synaptopathy: Measures of temporal envelope processing and spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Patro C, Kreft H, Wojtczak M Hear Res. 2021; 409:108333.

PMID: 34425347 PMC: 8424701. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108333.


Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.

Kortje M, Baumann U, Stover T, Weissgerber T PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241015.

PMID: 33075114 PMC: 7571672. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241015.


Perceptual Weighting of Binaural Lateralization Cues across Frequency Bands.

Ahrens A, Joshi S, Epp B J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2020; 21(6):485-496.

PMID: 32915339 PMC: 7644719. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00770-3.


Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Baltzell L, Swaminathan J, Cho A, Lavandier M, Best V J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 147(3):1546.

PMID: 32237845 PMC: 7060089. DOI: 10.1121/10.0000812.


Senescent Changes in Sensitivity to Binaural Temporal Fine Structure.

Fullgrabe C, Sek A, Moore B Trends Hear. 2018; 22:2331216518788224.

PMID: 30027803 PMC: 6055238. DOI: 10.1177/2331216518788224.

References
1.
Mossop J, Culling J . Lateralization of large interaural delays. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 104(3 Pt 1):1574-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.424369. View

2.
Dietz M, Ewert S, Hohmann V . Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125(3):1622-35. DOI: 10.1121/1.3076045. View

3.
Joris P, Louage D, Cardoen L, van der Heijden M . Correlation index: a new metric to quantify temporal coding. Hear Res. 2006; 216-217:19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.010. View

4.
Fullgrabe C, Moore B . Evaluation of a Method for Determining Binaural Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure (TFS-AF Test) for Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Low-Frequency Hearing. Trends Hear. 2017; 21:2331216517737230. PMC: 5669320. DOI: 10.1177/2331216517737230. View

5.
Stern R, Zeiberg A, Trahiotis C . Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: a weighted-image model. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 84(1):156-65. DOI: 10.1121/1.396982. View