» Articles » PMID: 29602988

Mobile, Real-time, and Point-of-care Augmented Reality is Robust, Accurate, and Feasible: a Prospective Pilot Study

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality (AR) systems are currently being explored by a broad spectrum of industries, mainly for improving point-of-care access to data and images. Especially in surgery and especially for timely decisions in emergency cases, a fast and comprehensive access to images at the patient bedside is mandatory. Currently, imaging data are accessed at a distance from the patient both in time and space, i.e., at a specific workstation. Mobile technology and 3-dimensional (3D) visualization of radiological imaging data promise to overcome these restrictions by making bedside AR feasible.

Methods: In this project, AR was realized in a surgical setting by fusing a 3D-representation of structures of interest with live camera images on a tablet computer using marker-based registration. The intent of this study was to focus on a thorough evaluation of AR. Feasibility, robustness, and accuracy were thus evaluated consecutively in a phantom model and a porcine model. Additionally feasibility was evaluated in one male volunteer.

Results: In the phantom model (n = 10), AR visualization was feasible in 84% of the visualization space with high accuracy (mean reprojection error ± standard deviation (SD): 2.8 ± 2.7 mm; 95th percentile = 6.7 mm). In a porcine model (n = 5), AR visualization was feasible in 79% with high accuracy (mean reprojection error ± SD: 3.5 ± 3.0 mm; 95th percentile = 9.5 mm). Furthermore, AR was successfully used and proved feasible within a male volunteer.

Conclusions: Mobile, real-time, and point-of-care AR for clinical purposes proved feasible, robust, and accurate in the phantom, animal, and single-trial human model shown in this study. Consequently, AR following similar implementation proved robust and accurate enough to be evaluated in clinical trials assessing accuracy, robustness in clinical reality, as well as integration into the clinical workflow. If these further studies prove successful, AR might revolutionize data access at patient bedside.

Citing Articles

Smartphone Technology for Applications in Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Interventional Procedures.

Lee K, Muniyandi P, Li M, Saccenti L, Christou A, Xu S Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 48(2):142-156.

PMID: 39681741 PMC: 11790737. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03925-4.


Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System Integrated with Deep Learning.

Chiou S, Liu L, Lee C, Kim D, Al-Masni M, Liu H Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37237687 PMC: 10215407. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050617.


Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System for External Ventricular Drain.

Chiou S, Zhang Z, Liu H, Yan J, Wei K, Chen P Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(10).

PMID: 36292263 PMC: 9601392. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101815.


Smartphone Augmented Reality CT-Based Platform for Needle Insertion Guidance: A Phantom Study.

Hecht R, Li M, de Ruiter Q, Pritchard W, Li X, Krishnasamy V Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020; 43(5):756-764.

PMID: 31915907 PMC: 8979406. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02403-6.


[Robotics and augmented reality : Current state of development and future perspectives].

Feussner H, Ostler D, Wilhelm D Chirurg. 2018; 89(10):760-768.

PMID: 30132168 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-018-0697-z.

References
1.
Carter T, Sermesant M, Cash D, Barratt D, Tanner C, Hawkes D . Application of soft tissue modelling to image-guided surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 27(10):893-909. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.005. View

2.
Wurmb T, Quaisser C, Balling H, Kredel M, Muellenbach R, Kenn W . Whole-body multislice computed tomography (MSCT) improves trauma care in patients requiring surgery after multiple trauma. Emerg Med J. 2010; 28(4):300-4. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.082164. View

3.
Teber D, Simpfendorfer T, Guven S, Baumhauer M, Gozen A, Rassweiler J . In-vitro evaluation of a soft-tissue navigation system for laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010; 24(9):1487-91. DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0289. View

4.
Robinson J . The skeptical technophile: iPad review. J Digit Imaging. 2012; 25(3):365-8. PMC: 3348982. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9467-5. View

5.
Oizumi H, Kato H, Watarai H, Sadahiro M . Three-dimensional computed tomography image overlay facilitates thoracoscopic trocar placement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 146(3):720-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.04.031. View