» Articles » PMID: 29599724

Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate in Recreational Marathon Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study on Fox's and Tanaka's Equations

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2018 Mar 31
PMID 29599724
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Age-based prediction equations of maximal heart rate (HR), such as the popular formulas Fox's 220-age, or Tanaka's 208-0.7 × age, have been widely used in various populations. Surprisingly, so far these equations have not been validated in marathon runners, despite the importance of the role of HR for training purposes in endurance running. The aim of the present study was to examine the validity of Fox and Tanaka equations in a large sample of women and men recreational marathon runners. Participants ( = 180, age 43.2 ± 8.5 years, VO 46.8 mL/min/kg, finishers in at least one marathon during the last year) performed a graded exercise test on a treadmill, where HR was measured. Measured HR correlated largely with age in the total sample ( = -0.50, < 0.001), women ( = -0.60, < 0.001) and men ( = -0.53, < 0.001). In women, a large main effect of method on HR ( = 0.001, η = 0.294) was shown with measured HR lower than Fox-HR (-4.8 bpm; -8.4, -1.3) and Tanaka-HR (-4.9 bpm; -8.1, -1.8). In men, a moderate effect of assessment method on HR was found ( = 0.001, η = 0.066) with measured HR higher than Fox-HR (+2.8; 1.0, 4.6), Tanaka-HR higher than Fox-HR (+1.2; 0.7, 1.7). Based on these findings, it was concluded that Fox and Tanaka' formulas overestimated HR by ~5 bpm in women, whereas Fox underestimated HR in men by ~3 bpm. Thus, we recommend the further use of Tanaka's formula in men marathon runners. In addition, exercise physiologists and sport scientists should consider the observed differences among various assessment methods when performing exercise testing or prescribing training program relying on HR.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Wearable-Based Real-Time Feedback on Running Injuries and Running Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Van Hooren B, Plasqui G, Meijer K Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(3):750-765.

PMID: 38287728 PMC: 10905988. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231222464.


The influence of maturation and sex on intracranial blood velocities during exercise in children.

Douglas A, Talbot J, Perkins D, Dawkins T, Oliver J, Lloyd R J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023; 136(3):451-459.

PMID: 38126090 PMC: 11212810. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00478.2023.


Are Activity Wrist-Worn Devices Accurate for Determining Heart Rate during Intense Exercise?.

Martin-Escudero P, Cabanas A, Dotor-Castilla M, Galindo-Canales M, Miguel-Tobal F, Fernandez-Perez C Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36829748 PMC: 9952291. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10020254.


Changes in training activity post COVID-19 infection in recreational runners and cyclists.

Emeran A, Lambert E, Paruk T, Bosch A S Afr J Sports Med. 2023; 34(1):v34i1a13758.

PMID: 36815935 PMC: 9924504. DOI: 10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a13758.


Re-Visiting Maximal Heart Rate Prediction Using Cross-Validation in Population Aged 7-55 Years.

Park J, Jung H, Jung Y, Song J, Lee J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(14).

PMID: 35886359 PMC: 9320369. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148509.


References
1.
Batterham A, Hopkins W . Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2008; 1(1):50-7. View

2.
Krautgasser S, Scheiber P, von Duvillard S, Muller E . Physiological responses of elderly recreational alpine skiers of different fitness and skiing abilities. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 10(4):748-53. PMC: 3761503. View

3.
Zavorsky G . Evidence and possible mechanisms of altered maximum heart rate with endurance training and tapering. Sports Med. 2000; 29(1):13-26. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200029010-00002. View

4.
FOX 3rd S, Naughton J, Haskell W . Physical activity and the prevention of coronary heart disease. Ann Clin Res. 1971; 3(6):404-32. View

5.
Cleary M, Hetzler R, Wages J, Lentz M, Stickley C, Kimura I . Comparisons of age-predicted maximum heart rate equations in college-aged subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25(9):2591-7. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182001832. View