» Articles » PMID: 29598865

PET Assessment of Epicardial Intimal Disease and Microvascular Dysfunction in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 31
PMID 29598865
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of graft failure and death after heart transplantation. Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification using rubidium 82 (Rb-82) positron emission tomography (PET) could enable evaluation of diagnostically challenging diffuse epicardial and microvascular disease in CAV.

Objectives: The authors aimed to evaluate Rb-82 PET detection of CAV.

Methods: Consecutive transplant recipients undergoing coronary angiography were prospectively evaluated with PET, multivessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and intracoronary hemodynamics. CAV was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation CAV on angiography and maximal intimal thickness ≥0.5 mm on IVUS.

Results: Forty patients (mean age 56 years, 4.8 years post-transplant) completed evaluation. CAV was detected in 32 patients (80%) by IVUS and 14 (35%) by angiography. PET correlated significantly with invasive coronary flow indices: r = 0.29, rate-pressure product-adjusted myocardial flow reserve (cMFR) versus coronary flow reserve; r = 0.28, relative flow reserve versus fractional flow reserve; and r = 0.37, coronary vascular resistance (CVR) versus index of microcirculatory resistance. Patients with CAV or microvascular dysfunction had reduced cMFR and stress MBF and increased CVR. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated good accuracy of PET for CAV on IVUS (area under the curve 0.77 to 0.81) and optimal diagnostic cutoffs of cMFR <2.9, stress MBF <2.3, and CVR >55. Combined PET assessment for CAV yielded excellent >93% sensitivity (>65% specificity) for 1 abnormal parameter and >96% specificity (>55% sensitivity) for 2 abnormal parameters.

Conclusions: Rb-82 PET flow quantification has high diagnostic accuracy for CAV, with potential for noninvasive evaluation after heart transplantation.

Citing Articles

PET/CT with Myocardial Blood Flow Assessment Is Prognostic of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Progression and Clinical Outcomes.

Prasad N, Harris E, Defilippis E, Sayer G, Chernovolenko M, Colombo P J Nucl Med. 2025; 66(2):264-270.

PMID: 39819689 PMC: 11800734. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268713.


Temporal changes in CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients after heart transplantation.

Sharma S, Sanz J, Hirsch A, Patel R, Constantinescu A, Barghash M Eur Radiol. 2024; 35(1):232-243.

PMID: 39014089 PMC: 11631993. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10932-z.


Impact of pretransplant T2DM on left ventricular deformation and myocardial perfusion in heart transplanted recipients: a 3.0 T cardiac magnetic resonance study.

Cao L, Liu C, Ou C, Ma Q, Xu H, Li X Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):216.

PMID: 38907259 PMC: 11193171. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02323-x.


Chest Pain Evaluation: Diagnostic Testing.

Chow B, Galiwango P, Poulin A, Raggi P, Small G, Juneau D CJC Open. 2024; 5(12):891-903.

PMID: 38204849 PMC: 10774086. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.09.001.


Multimodality Imaging in Advanced Heart Failure for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-Up: A Comprehensive Review.

Pergola V, Cameli M, Mattesi G, Mushtaq S, DAndrea A, Guaricci A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137711 PMC: 10743799. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247641.