Reducing High-Users' Visits to the Emergency Department by a Primary Care Intervention for the Uninsured: A Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal Inquiry

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2018 Mar 30

PMID 29591539

Citations 21

Authors

Meng-Han Tsai

Sudha Xirasagar

Scott Carroll

Charles S Bryan

Pamela J Gallagher

Kim Davis

Edward C Jauch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Reducing avoidable emergency department (ED) visits is an important health system goal. This is a retrospective cohort study of the impact of a primary care intervention including an in-hospital, free, adult clinic for poor uninsured patients on ED visit rates and emergency severity at a nonprofit hospital. We studied adult ED visits during August 16, 2009-August 15, 2011 (preintervention) and August 16, 2011-August 15, 2014 (postintervention). We compared pre- versus post-mean annual visit rates and discharge emergency severity index (ESI; triage and resource use-based, calculated Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality categories) among high-users (≥3 ED visits in 12 months) and occasional users. Annual adult ED visit volumes were 16 372 preintervention (47.5% by high-users), versus 18 496 postintervention. High-users' mean annual visit rates were 5.43 (top quartile) and 0.94 (bottom quartile) preintervention, versus 3.21 and 1.11, respectively, for returning high-users, postintervention (all P < .001). Postintervention, the visit rates of new high-users were lower (lowest and top quartile rates, 0.6 and 3.23) than preintervention high-users' rates in the preintervention period. Visit rates of the top quartile of occasional users also declined. Subgroup analysis of medically uninsured high-users showed similar results. Upon classifying preintervention high-users by emergency severity, postintervention mean ESI increased 24.5% among the lowest ESI quartile, and decreased 12.2% among the top quartile. Pre- and post-intervention sample demographics and comorbidities were similar. The observed reductions in overall ED visit rates, particularly low-severity visits; highest reductions observed among high-users and the top quartile of occasional users; and the pattern of changes in emergency severity support a positive impact of the primary care intervention.

Citing Articles

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Utilization among Medically Underserved Patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions.

Chumbler N, Ogunsanmi D, Surbhi S Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024; 11:23333928241283367.

PMID: 39314671 PMC: 11418340. DOI: 10.1177/23333928241283367.

Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.

Nummedal M, King S, Uleberg O, Pedersen S, Bjornsen L BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):117.

PMID: 38997631 PMC: 11242019. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.

Barriers to Participation in a Structured Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Emergency Department Visits-A Qualitative Study.

Penny M, Vitous C, Bradley S, Stricklen A, Ross R, Charbeneau E J Surg Res. 2024; 300:542-549.

PMID: 38889483 PMC: 11523281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.022.

Best Practices for Treating Blind and Visually Impaired Patients in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

Hamadah K, Velagapudi M, Navarro J, Pirotte A, Obersteadt C West J Emerg Med. 2024; 25(3):350-357.

PMID: 38801041 PMC: 11112656. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.61686.

Strategies to Measure and Improve Emergency Department Performance: A Review.

Mostafa R, El-Atawi K Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52879.

PMID: 38406097 PMC: 10890971. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52879.

References

Burns J, Sacchetti A . Enrollment with a primary care provider does not preclude ED visits for patients with woman's health-related problems. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 34(2):266-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.030. View

Fung C, Wong C, Fong D, Lee A, Lam C . Having a family doctor was associated with lower utilization of hospital-based health services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:42. PMC: 4312460. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0705-7. View

Rosenthal M, Alidina S, Friedberg M, Singer S, Eastman D, Li Z . A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, Utilization and Cost Following the Colorado Multi-Payer Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 31(3):289-96. PMC: 4762834. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3521-1. View

Palmer E, LeBlanc-Duchin D, Murray J, Atkinson P . Emergency department use: is frequent use associated with a lack of primary care provider?. Can Fam Physician. 2014; 60(4):e223-9. PMC: 4046533. View

Mandelberg J, Kuhn R, Kohn M . Epidemiologic analysis of an urban, public emergency department's frequent users. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7(6):637-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02037.x. View

D Reschovsky J, Hadley J, Saiontz-Martinez C, Boukus E . Following the money: factors associated with the cost of treating high-cost Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2011; 46(4):997-1021. PMC: 3165175. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01242.x. View

Grumbach K, Keane D, Bindman A . Primary care and public emergency department overcrowding. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83(3):372-8. PMC: 1694659. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.3.372. View

Zocchi M, McClelland M, Pines J . Increasing Throughput: Results from a 42-Hospital Collaborative to Improve Emergency Department Flow. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015; 41(12):532-42. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41070-0. View

Brice J, Friend K, Delbridge T . Accuracy of EMS-recorded patient demographic data. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008; 12(2):187-91. DOI: 10.1080/10903120801907687. View

10.

Glover C, Purim-Shem-Tov Y, Johnson T, Shah S . Medicaid beneficiaries who continue to use the ED: a focus on the Illinois Medical Home Network. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 34(2):197-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.011. View

11.

Doran K, Colucci A, Hessler R, Ngai C, Williams N, Wallach A . An intervention connecting low-acuity emergency department patients with primary care: effect on future primary care linkage. Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 61(3):312-321.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.021. View

12.

Kim T, Mortensen K, Eldridge B . Linking uninsured patients treated in the emergency department to primary care shows some promise in Maryland. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015; 34(5):796-804. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1102. View

13.

Hsia R, Kellermann A, Shen Y . Factors associated with closures of emergency departments in the United States. JAMA. 2011; 305(19):1978-85. PMC: 4063529. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.620. View

14.

Hunt K, Weber E, Showstack J, Colby D, Callaham M . Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.030. View

15.

Ronksley P, Liu E, McKay J, Kobewka D, Rothwell D, Mulpuru S . Variations in Resource Intensity and Cost Among High Users of the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2016; 23(6):722-30. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12939. View

16.

Schull M, Vermeulen M, Slaughter G, Morrison L, Daly P . Emergency department crowding and thrombolysis delays in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44(6):577-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.05.004. View

17.

Greenwald P, Estevez R, Clark S, Stern M, Rosen T, Flomenbaum N . The ED as the primary source of hospital admission for older (but not younger) adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(6):943-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.041. View

18.

Zuckerman S, Shen Y . Characteristics of occasional and frequent emergency department users: do insurance coverage and access to care matter?. Med Care. 2004; 42(2):176-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108747.51198.41. View

19.

Bernstein S, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U . The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 16(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x. View

20.

Ward M, Baker O, Schuur J . Association of Emergency Department Length of Stay and Crowding for Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. West J Emerg Med. 2016; 16(7):1067-72. PMC: 4703176. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27908. View