» Articles » PMID: 29590345

Proactive Infliximab Monitoring Following Reactive Testing is Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes Than Reactive Testing Alone in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 29
PMID 29590345
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Reactive testing has emerged as the new standard of care for managing loss of response to infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Recent data suggest that proactive infliximab monitoring is associated with better therapeutic outcomes in IBD. Nevertheless, there are no data regarding the clinical utility of proactive infliximab monitoring after first reactive testing. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of proactive infliximab monitoring following reactive testing compared with reactive testing alone in patients with IBD.

Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive IBD patients on infliximab maintenance therapy receiving a first reactive testing between September 2006 and January 2015. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A [proactive infliximab monitoring after reactive testing] and Group B [reactive testing alone]. Patients were followed through December 2015. Time-to-event analysis for treatment failure and IBD-related surgery and hospitalization was performed. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation due to either loss of response or serious adverse event.

Results: The study population consisted of 102 [n = 70, 69% with CD] patients [Group A, n = 33 and Group B, n = 69] who were followed for (median, interquartile range [IQR]) 2.7 [1.4-3.8] years. Multiple Cox regression analysis identified proactive following reactive TDM as independently associated with less treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.51; p = 0.002) and fewer IBD-related hospitalizations [HR: 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.99; p = 0.007].

Conclusions: This study showed that proactive infliximab monitoring following reactive testing was associated with greater drug persistence and fewer IBD-related hospitalizations than reactive testing alone.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis on Infliximab: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Dupenloup P, Zhou M, Dizon M, Shah A, Goldhaber-Fiebert J, Owens D Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(2):728-737.

PMID: 39724469 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08802-1.


Infliximab monitoring in Crohn's disease: a neural network approach for evaluating disease activity and immunogenicity.

Gomes L, Genaro L, de Castro M, Ricci R, Pascoal L, Silva F Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241251949.

PMID: 39664232 PMC: 11632880. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241251949.


Treatment Targets Should Influence Choice of Infliximab Dose Intensification Strategy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation Study.

Srinivasan A, Van Langenberg D, De Cruz P, Segal J, Vasudevan A, Upton R BioDrugs. 2024; 38(5):691-702.

PMID: 39168947 PMC: 11358351. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2.


HLA-DQA1*05 correlates with increased risk of anti-drug antibody development and reduced response to infliximab in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease.

Wang W, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Liu T, Yao J, Peng X Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2024; 12:goae074.

PMID: 39055374 PMC: 11269678. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goae074.


Early proactive monitoring of DNA-thioguanine in patients with Crohn's disease predicts thiopurine-induced late leucopenia in NUDT15/TPMT normal metabolizers.

Yang T, Chao K, Zhu X, Wang X, Chan S, Guan Y World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(12):1751-1763.

PMID: 38617736 PMC: 11008375. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i12.1751.


References
1.
Miligkos M, Papamichael K, Vande Casteele N, Mantzaris G, Gils A, Levesque B . Efficacy and Safety Profile of Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Versus Anti-integrin Agents for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of Indirect Comparisons. Clin Ther. 2016; 38(6):1342-1358.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.018. View

2.
Papamichael K, Chachu K, Vajravelu R, Vaughn B, Ni J, Osterman M . Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Proactive Compared With Reactive Monitoring of Serum Concentrations of Infliximab. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(10):1580-1588.e3. PMC: 5605429. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.03.031. View

3.
Billiet T, Cleynen I, Ballet V, Ferrante M, Van Assche G, Gils A . Prognostic factors for long-term infliximab treatment in Crohn's disease patients: a 20-year single centre experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 44(7):673-83. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13754. View

4.
Papamichael K, Cheifetz A . Use of anti-TNF drug levels to optimise patient management. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017; 7(4):289-300. PMC: 5369499. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100685. View

5.
Kelly O, Donnell S, Stempak J, Steinhart A, Silverberg M . Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Infliximab Dose Adjustment is Associated with Better Endoscopic Outcomes than Clinical Decision Making Alone in Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017; 23(7):1202-1209. DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001126. View