» Articles » PMID: 29589150

Assessment of the Pollution and Ecological Risk of Lead and Cadmium in Soils

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 29
PMID 29589150
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the content, distribution, soil binding capacity, and ecological risk of cadmium and lead in the soils of Malopolska (South Poland). The investigation of 320 soil samples from differently used land (grassland, arable land, forest, wasteland) revealed a very high variation in the metal content in the soils. The pollution of soils with cadmium and lead is moderate. Generally, a point source of lead and cadmium pollution was noted in the study area. The highest content of cadmium and lead was found in the northwestern part of the area-the industrial zones (mining and metallurgical activity). These findings are confirmed by the arrangement of semivariogram surfaces and bivariate Moran's correlation coefficients. Among the different types of land use, forest soils had by far the highest mean content of bioavailable forms of both metals. The results showed a higher soil binding capacity for lead than for cadmium. However, for both metals, extremely high (class 5) accumulation capacities were dominant. Based on the results, the investigated soils had a low (Pb) and moderate (Cd) ecological risk on living components. Soil properties, such as organic C, pH, sand, silt, and clay content, correlated with the content of total and bioavailable forms of metals in the soils. The correlations, despite being statistically significant, were characterized by very low values of correlation coefficient (r = 0.12-0.20, at p ≤ 0.05). Therefore, the obtained data do not allow to define any conclusions as to the relationships between these soil properties. However, it must be highlighted that there was a very strong positive correlation between the total content of cadmium and lead and their bioavailable forms in the soils.

Citing Articles

Collembola growth in heavy metal-contaminated soils.

Gruss I, Lallaouna R, Twardowski J, Magiera-Dulewicz J, Twardowska K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27998.

PMID: 39543386 PMC: 11564797. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79766-5.


Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) and ecological risk at waste disposal sites: An analysis of sanitary landfills.

Podlasek A, Vaverkova M, Jakimiuk A, Koda E PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303272.

PMID: 38758824 PMC: 11101111. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303272.


A comprehensive investigation of geoenvironmental pollution and health effects from municipal solid waste landfills.

Podlasek A, Vaverkova M, Jakimiuk A, Koda E Environ Geochem Health. 2024; 46(3):97.

PMID: 38393507 PMC: 10891210. DOI: 10.1007/s10653-024-01852-4.


Cadmium Toxicity and Health Effects-A Brief Summary.

Charkiewicz A, Omeljaniuk W, Nowak K, Garley M, Niklinski J Molecules. 2023; 28(18).

PMID: 37764397 PMC: 10537762. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28186620.


Involvement of Nrf2 Signaling in Lead-induced Toxicity.

Arabnezhad M, Haghani F, Ghaffarian-Bahraman A, Jafarzadeh E, Mohammadi H, Ghasemian Yadegari J Curr Med Chem. 2023; 31(23):3529-3549.

PMID: 37221680 DOI: 10.2174/0929867330666230522143341.


References
1.
Imperato M, Adamo P, Naimo D, Arienzo M, Stanzione D, Violante P . Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy). Environ Pollut. 2003; 124(2):247-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00478-5. View

2.
An Y . Soil ecotoxicity assessment using cadmium sensitive plants. Environ Pollut. 2003; 127(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(03)00263-x. View

3.
Ettler V, Vanek A, Mihaljevic M, Bezdicka P . Contrasting lead speciation in forest and tilled soils heavily polluted by lead metallurgy. Chemosphere. 2005; 58(10):1449-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.084. View

4.
Blume H, Brummer G . Prediction of heavy metal behavior in soil by means of simple field tests. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1991; 22(2):164-74. DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(91)90056-u. View

5.
Fairbrother A, Wenstel R, Sappington K, Wood W . Framework for metals risk assessment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007; 68(2):145-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.03.015. View