» Articles » PMID: 29588703

Primary Angioplasty For Patients in Cardiogenic Shock: Optimal Management

Overview
Journal Interv Cardiol
Date 2018 Mar 29
PMID 29588703
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiogenic shock complicates approximately 5-10 % of all MI events and remains the most common cause of death among MI cases. Over the past few decades, the mortality rate associated with cardiogenic shock has decreased with the introduction of early revascularisation, although there are limited data for patients with triple-vessel disease and left main stem disease. In more recent years, there have been a number of advances in the mechanical circulatory support devices that can help improve the haemodynamics of patients in cardiogenic shock. Despite these advances, together with progress in the use of inotropes and vasopressors, cardiogenic shock remains associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. This review will outline the management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI with a smajor focus on revascularisation techniques and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices.

Citing Articles

Steps To Prevent Mortality in a Patient with Coinciding Severe Sepsis and Cardiogenic Shock Post-Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI): A Case Report.

Nagaratnam J, Farooq R, El Dirani M, Mathew S, Ogwu C, Kholoki S Cureus. 2023; 14(11):e32086.

PMID: 36600844 PMC: 9803867. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32086.

References
1.
OGara P, Kushner F, Ascheim D, Casey Jr D, Chung M, de Lemos J . 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration.... Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82(1):E1-27. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24776. View

2.
Hochman J, Boland J, Sleeper L, Porway M, Brinker J, Col J . Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an International Registry. SHOCK Registry Investigators. Circulation. 1995; 91(3):873-81. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.91.3.873. View

3.
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, Frohlich G, Bott-Flugel L, Byrne R . A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(19):1584-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065. View

4.
Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T . Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(20):2535-43. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs264. View

5.
Tousek P, Rokyta R, Tesarova J, Pudil R, Belohlavek J, Stasek J . Routine upfront abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock: The PRAGUE-7 Study. An open randomized multicentre study. Acute Card Care. 2011; 13(3):116-22. DOI: 10.3109/17482941.2011.567282. View