» Articles » PMID: 29582364

Primary Care Providers' Intended Use of Decision Aids for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening

Overview
Journal J Cancer Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Mar 28
PMID 29582364
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Decision aids are tools intended to help people weigh the benefits and harms of a health decision. We examined primary care providers' perspective on use of decision aids and explored whether providers' beliefs and interest in use of a decision aid was associated with offering the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for early detection of prostate cancer. Data were obtained from 2016 DocStyles, an annual, web-based survey of U.S. healthcare professionals including primary care physicians (n = 1003) and nurse practitioners (n = 253). We found that the majority of primary care providers reported not using (patient) decision aids for prostate cancer screening, but were interested in learning about and incorporating these tools in their practice. Given the potential of decision aids to guide in informed decision-making, there is an opportunity for evaluating existing decision aids for prostate cancer screening for clinical use.

Citing Articles

Shared medical decision in prostate cancer screening in primary care: a systematic literature review of current evidence.

Lutaud R, Ollivier Q, Fierling T Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 56(7):2251-2259.

PMID: 38316684 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-03947-4.


Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions.

Pekala K, Shill D, Austria M, Langford A, Loeb S, Carlsson S Nat Rev Urol. 2024; 21(6):329-338.

PMID: 38168921 PMC: 11250989. DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00840-0.


The effects of histone crotonylation and bromodomain protein 4 on prostate cancer cell lines.

Xu X, Zhu X, Liu F, Lu W, Wang Y, Yu J Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(2):900-914.

PMID: 33718091 PMC: 7947446. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-53.


Understanding User Acceptance of Clinical Decision Support Systems to Promote Increased Cancer Screening Rates in a Primary Care Practice.

Kelsey E, Njeru J, Chaudhry R, Fischer K, Schroeder D, Croghan I J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11:2150132720958832.

PMID: 33016170 PMC: 7543103. DOI: 10.1177/2150132720958832.


Evaluating two decision aids for Australian men supporting informed decisions about prostate cancer screening: A randomised controlled trial.

Pickles K, Kazda L, Barratt A, McGeechan K, Hersch J, McCaffery K PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227304.

PMID: 31940376 PMC: 6961909. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227304.


References
1.
Herrmann A, Mansfield E, Hall A, Sanson-Fisher R, Zdenkowski N . Wilfully out of sight? A literature review on the effectiveness of cancer-related decision aids and implementation strategies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016; 16:36. PMC: 4793751. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-016-0273-8. View

2.
Taylor K, Williams R, Davis K, Luta G, Penek S, Barry S . Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(18):1704-12. PMC: 3992617. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9253. View

3.
Ilic D, Jammal W, Chiarelli P, Gardiner R, Hughes S, Stefanovic D . Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2015; 24(10):1303-1315. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3815. View

4.
Moyer V . Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(2):120-34. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. View

5.
Carter H, Albertsen P, Barry M, Etzioni R, Freedland S, Greene K . Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190(2):419-26. PMC: 4020420. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. View