» Articles » PMID: 29581394

Collective Animal Navigation and Migratory Culture: from Theoretical Models to Empirical Evidence

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2018 Mar 28
PMID 29581394
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animals often travel in groups, and their navigational decisions can be influenced by social interactions. Both theory and empirical observations suggest that such collective navigation can result in individuals improving their ability to find their way and could be one of the key benefits of sociality for these species. Here, we provide an overview of the potential mechanisms underlying collective navigation, review the known, and supposed, empirical evidence for such behaviour and highlight interesting directions for future research. We further explore how both social and collective learning during group navigation could lead to the accumulation of knowledge at the population level, resulting in the emergence of migratory culture.This article is part of the theme issue 'Collective movement ecology'.

Citing Articles

Sexually differentiated decision-making involves faster recruitment in the early stages for the Tibetan antelopes .

Zhu Q, Guan J, Lei T, Xuan K, Guo S, Zhao Y Curr Zool. 2025; 71(1):124-135.

PMID: 39996253 PMC: 11847017. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoae036.


North American avian species that migrate in flocks show greater long-term non-breeding range shift rates.

Vickers S, Meehan T, Michel N, Franco A, Gilroy J Mov Ecol. 2025; 13(1):3.

PMID: 39806506 PMC: 11730467. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00527-0.


Collective movement increases initial accuracy and path efficiency in talitrid amphipod orientation.

Phillips M, Granger J, Johnsen S Biol Lett. 2024; 20(12):20240497.

PMID: 39628372 PMC: 11615670. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0497.


Evidence for an Adaptive, Large-Scale Range Shift in a Long-Distance Terrestrial Migrant.

Gurarie E, Beaupre C, Couriot O, Cameron M, Fagan W, Joly K Glob Chang Biol. 2024; 30(11):e17589.

PMID: 39604295 PMC: 11602692. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17589.


Competition and Facilitation Influence Central Place Foraging Ecology in a Colonial Marine Predator.

Langley L, Cox S, Patrick S, Votier S Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70494.

PMID: 39588348 PMC: 11586682. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70494.


References
1.
Kao A, Couzin I . Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1784):20133305. PMC: 4043084. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3305. View

2.
Reebs . Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(2):403-409. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1314. View

3.
Holland R, Wikelski M, Wilcove D . How and why do insects migrate?. Science. 2006; 313(5788):794-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1127272. View

4.
Bauer S, Hoye B . Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science. 2014; 344(6179):1242552. DOI: 10.1126/science.1242552. View

5.
Altizer S, Bartel R, Han B . Animal migration and infectious disease risk. Science. 2011; 331(6015):296-302. DOI: 10.1126/science.1194694. View