» Articles » PMID: 29572055

Prospective Evaluation of Predictors of Testis Atrophy After Surgery for Testis Torsion in Children

Abstract

Objective: To prospectively correlate pain duration, red scrotal skin, ultrasound appearance of testis, and intraoperative testis color to future testis atrophy after acute testicular torsion.

Methods: Patients 2 months-18 years old with unilateral acute scrotum were consecutively enrolled in a National Institutes of Health transcutaneous near-infrared spectroscopy study, with a subgroup analysis of the true torsion group. Presence or absence of red scrotal skin, pain duration, testicular heterogeneity on preoperative ultrasound, and intraoperative testis color based on a novel visual chart 5 minutes after detorsion were recorded. All testes underwent orchiopexy regardless of appearance. Percent volume difference between normal and torsed testicles on follow-up ultrasound was compared between patients with and without risk factors.

Results: Thirty of 56 patients who had surgical detorsion underwent scrotal ultrasound at a mean of 117 days after surgery. A color of black or hemorrhagic 5 minutes after detorsion, pain duration >12 hours, and heterogeneous parenchyma on preoperative ultrasound were associated with significant testis volume loss in follow-up compared with normal testis. All patients with a black or hemorrhagic testis had >80% volume loss. Erythematous scrotal skin was not significantly associated with smaller affected testis volume in follow-up.

Conclusion: Based on the high atrophy rate, orchiectomy can be considered for testes that are black or hemorrhagic 5 minutes after detorsion. Pain duration >12 hours and parenchymal heterogeneity on preoperative ultrasound were also associated with testis atrophy. Red scrotal skin was not a reliable predictor of atrophy and should not delay exploration.

Citing Articles

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging as a predictor of long-term testicular atrophy in testicular torsion: a pilot study.

Komatsu S, Terui K, Takenouchi A, Kawaguchi Y, Nishimura K, Oita S Surg Today. 2024; 55(3):386-392.

PMID: 39085699 PMC: 11842500. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02908-9.


Factors Determining Testicular Torsion and Consequent Orchiectomy in Pediatric Patients Presenting With Scrotal Pain.

Yen C, Chang Y, Ming Y, Gau C, Wu C, Lee J Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023; 39(10):744-750.

PMID: 37624776 PMC: 10547102. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003037.


Situation of Pediatric Patients with Testicular Torsion in Times of COVID-19.

Komarowska M, Kowalska M, Grubczak K, Pawelczyk A, Hermanowicz A, Debek W Emerg Med Int. 2023; 2023:9960452.

PMID: 37197364 PMC: 10185415. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9960452.


Testicular salvage: using machine learning algorithm to develop a predictive model in testicular torsion.

Eksi M, Yavuzsan A, Evren I, Ayten A, Fakir A, Akkas F Pediatr Surg Int. 2022; 38(10):1481-1486.

PMID: 35915183 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05185-0.


[Management of testicular torsion by a general surgeon isolated in Africa].

Long-Depaquit T, Chiron P, Bourgouin S, Hardy J, Deledalle F, Laroche J Med Trop Sante Int. 2022; 2(2).

PMID: 35685303 PMC: 9128443. DOI: 10.48327/mtsi.v2i2.2022.230.


References
1.
Visser A, Heyns C . Testicular function after torsion of the spermatic cord. BJU Int. 2003; 92(3):200-3. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04307.x. View

2.
Molokwu C, Somani B, Goodman C . Outcomes of scrotal exploration for acute scrotal pain suspicious of testicular torsion: a consecutive case series of 173 patients. BJU Int. 2011; 107(6):990-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09557.x. View

3.
Dogra V, Bhatt S . Acute painful scrotum. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004; 42(2):349-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2003.12.002. View

4.
Anderson M, Dunn J, Lipshultz L, Coburn M . Semen quality and endocrine parameters after acute testicular torsion. J Urol. 1992; 147(6):1545-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37622-x. View

5.
Cost N, Bush N, Barber T, Huang R, Baker L . Pediatric testicular torsion: demographics of national orchiopexy versus orchiectomy rates. J Urol. 2011; 185(6 Suppl):2459-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.016. View