» Articles » PMID: 29566147

Species-specific Mutation Rates for AmpC Derepression in Enterobacterales with Chromosomally Encoded Inducible AmpC β-lactamase

Overview
Date 2018 Mar 23
PMID 29566147
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: AmpC β-lactamases are encoded on the chromosomes of certain Enterobacterales and lead to clinical resistance to various β-lactams in case of high-level expression. In WT bacteria with inducible AmpC, the expression is low, but selection of stably ampC-derepressed mutants may occur during β-lactam therapy. Thus, for Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii complex, Serratia spp. and Morganella morganii that test susceptible in vitro to oxyimino-cephalosporins, the EUCAST expert rules recommend suppressing susceptibility testing results for these agents or noting that their use in monotherapy should be discouraged, owing to the risk of selecting resistance. However, clinical observations suggest that emergence of resistance is not equally common in all species with inducible AmpC.

Objectives: To determine species-specific mutation rates, which are more accurate and reproducible than previously described mutant frequencies, for ampC derepression in Enterobacterales with inducible AmpC.

Methods: Mutation rates were determined using a protocol based on Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analyses. Overall, 237 isolates were analysed.

Results: Mutation rates were high in Enterobacter cloacae complex, Enterobacter aerogenes, C. freundii complex and Hafnia alvei isolates, with a mean mutation rate of 3 × 10-8. In contrast, mean mutation rates were considerably lower in Providencia spp., Serratia spp. and especially M. morganii isolates. Furthermore, we observed species-specific variations in the resistance patterns of ampC-derepressed mutants.

Conclusions: Our data might help to predict the risk of treatment failure with oxyimino-cephalosporins in infections by different Enterobacterales with inducible AmpC. Moreover, we make a proposal for optimization of the current EUCAST expert rule.

Citing Articles

Impact of two antimicrobial susceptibility reporting strategies on treatment of bacteremia caused by low-risk AmpC inducible organisms.

Mashru J, Elligsen M, Daneman N, Granger M, Kozak R, Li X Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025; 5(1):e70.

PMID: 40026759 PMC: 11869070. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2025.49.


Genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of clinical isolates between 2016 and 2023.

Zhu W, Liu Q, Liu J, Wang Y, Shen H, Wei M Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025; 14:1464736.

PMID: 39958990 PMC: 11826060. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1464736.


acquisition of antibiotic resistance in six species of bacteria.

Wang X, Koster A, Koenders B, Jonker M, Brul S, Ter Kuile B Microbiol Spectr. 2025; 13(3):e0178524.

PMID: 39907470 PMC: 11878088. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01785-24.


An insight into the genome-wide analysis of bacterial defense mechanisms in a uropathogenic Morganella morganii isolate from Bangladesh.

Al Sium S, Goswami B, Chowdhury S, Naser S, Sarkar M, Faruq M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313141.

PMID: 39847570 PMC: 11756799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313141.


Piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or carbapenems for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to bacteria producing chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Onorato L, De Luca I, Salvati A, Monari C, Coppola N Infection. 2024; .

PMID: 39630396 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-024-02447-y.