» Articles » PMID: 29563945

Excellent Treatment Outcomes in Children Younger Than 18 Months with Stage 4 Nonamplified Neuroblastoma

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2018 Mar 23
PMID 29563945
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Although the prognosis is generally good in patients with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma, no consensus has been reached on the ideal treatment regimen. This study analyzed treatment outcomes and toxicities in patients younger than 18 months with stage 4 nonamplified neuroblastoma.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients younger than 18 months newly diagnosed with stage 4 nonamplified neuroblastoma between January 2009 and December 2015. Patients received 9 cycles of chemotherapy and surgery, with or without local radiotherapy, followed by 12 cycles of differentiation therapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid. Chemotherapy consisted of alternating cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CEDC) and ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) regimens.

Results: The most common primary tumor site was the abdomen (85%), and the most common metastatic sites were the lymph nodes (65%), followed by the bones (60%), liver (55%), skin (45%), and bone marrow (25%). At the end of induction therapy, 14 patients (70%) achieved complete response, with 1 achieving very good partial response, 4 achieving partial response, and 1 showing mixed response. Nine patients (45%) received local radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 17-91 months), none of these patients experienced relapse, progression, or secondary malignancy, or died. Three years after chemotherapy completion, none of the patients had experienced grade ≥3 late adverse effects.

Conclusion: Patients younger than 18 months with stage 4 nonamplified neuroblastoma showed excellent outcomes, without significant late adverse effects, when treated with alternating cycles of CEDC and ICE, followed by surgery and differentiation therapy.

Citing Articles

Effect of tandem autologous stem cell transplantation on survival in pediatric patients with high-risk solid tumors in South China.

Luo Z, Fan L, Guo W, Yang J, Li Z, Huang Y World J Stem Cells. 2025; 17(2):100621.

PMID: 40061267 PMC: 11885945. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i2.100621.


Genomic ALK alterations in primary and relapsed neuroblastoma.

Rosswog C, Fassunke J, Ernst A, Schomig-Markiefka B, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Bartenhagen C Br J Cancer. 2023; 128(8):1559-1571.

PMID: 36807339 PMC: 10070426. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02208-y.

References
1.
Shimada H, Umehara S, Monobe Y, Hachitanda Y, Nakagawa A, Goto S . International neuroblastoma pathology classification for prognostic evaluation of patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Cancer. 2001; 92(9):2451-61. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011101)92:9<2451::aid-cncr1595>3.0.co;2-s. View

2.
Kandula S, Prabhu R, Nanda R, Switchenko J, Cash T, Qayed M . Outcomes After Radiation Therapy to Metastatic Sites in Patients With Stage 4 Neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014; 37(3):175-80. PMC: 4869887. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000264. View

3.
Brodeur G, Pritchard J, Berthold F, Carlsen N, Castel V, Castelberry R . Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11(8):1466-77. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.8.1466. View

4.
Shimada H, Ambros I, Dehner L, Hata J, JOSHI V, Roald B . The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system). Cancer. 1999; 86(2):364-72. View

5.
Cohn S, Pearson A, London W, Monclair T, Ambros P, Brodeur G . The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 27(2):289-97. PMC: 2650388. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785. View