» Articles » PMID: 29561902

Concordance Between the Original and Short Version of the Impulsive Behaviour Scale UPPS-P Using an IRT Model

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2018 Mar 22
PMID 29561902
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale (with five dimensions of impulsive behaviour) is being widely used. One of the handicaps of this instrument is its relatively long administration time. This has led to the development of a short version: SUPPS-P. There are no studies comparing the relationship between the SUPPS-P scores and the original UPPS-P scores. The objectives of this study, therefore, were to analyse the psychometric properties, concordance of person measures, and efficiency of the SUPPS-P compared to those on UPPS-P, applying an Item Response Theory Model. The UPPS-P and SUPPS-P were administered to 455 undergraduate students. Confirmatory factorial analysis replicated structures reported in previous studies: the five correlated factors structure and the model with two second-order factors (Urgency and Lack of Awareness) with Sensation Seeking dimension as a different factor. Rasch analysis show that both of the instruments presented adequate model-data fit. The results show the measurement for each dimension of UPPS-P offered more precision than SUPPS-P. The structure of items location was maintained in each dimension of SUPPS-P compared to the UPPS-P, but with better person and item separation indices of the UPPS-P dimensions. The concordance analysis reveals high correlations values between scores on both versions. From the standpoint of reducing items, it can be considered that the reduced version is more efficient. This study does not support the equivalence of items on the dimensions of Sensation Seeking and Lack of perseverance.

Citing Articles

Substance Use Motives as Mediators of the Associations between Self-Control Constructs and Negative Substance Use Consequences: A Cross-Cultural Examination.

Montgomery Z, Michelini Y, Bravo A, Pilatti A, Mezquita L Cannabis. 2024; 7(2):77-92.

PMID: 38975594 PMC: 11225986. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000211.


Self-control and problematic use of social networking sites: Examining distress tolerance as a mediator among Argentinian college students.

Pilatti A, Bravo A, Michelini Y, Aguirre P, Pautassi R Addict Behav Rep. 2021; 14:100389.

PMID: 34938847 PMC: 8664873. DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100389.


Cognitive control training for urgency: A pilot randomized controlled trial in an acute clinical sample.

Peckham A, Sandler J, Dattolico D, McHugh R, Johnson D, Bjorgvinsson T Behav Res Ther. 2021; 146:103968.

PMID: 34562728 PMC: 8555999. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103968.


Impulsivity, alcohol use and risky sexual behaviors in college students.

Leonangeli S, Rivarola Montejano G, Michelini Y Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2021; 78(2):153-157.

PMID: 34181843 PMC: 8741313. DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n2.29287.


Dampening of Positive Affect Predicts Substance Use During Partial Hospitalization.

Peckham A, McHugh R, Kneeland E, Bjorgvinsson T, Beard C Cognit Ther Res. 2021; 44:811-819.

PMID: 33551519 PMC: 7863783. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-020-10101-8.

References
1.
Sharma L, Markon K, Clark L . Toward a theory of distinct types of "impulsive" behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychol Bull. 2013; 140(2):374-408. DOI: 10.1037/a0034418. View

2.
Rojas A, Lozano O, Foresti K, Zolfaghari E, Zubaran C . Comparison and concordance of health-related quality of life tests among substance users. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13:186. PMC: 4653834. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-015-0364-8. View

3.
Fernandez-Calderon F, Diaz-Batanero C, Rojas-Tejada A, Castellanos-Ryan N, Lozano-Rojas O . Adaptation to the Spanish population of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (SURPS) and psychometric properties. Adicciones. 2017; 30(3):208-218. DOI: 10.20882/adicciones.909. View

4.
Reise S, Waller N . Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008; 5:27-48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553. View

5.
Mullins-Sweatt S, Widiger T . Clinical utility and DSM-V. Psychol Assess. 2009; 21(3):302-12. DOI: 10.1037/a0016607. View