Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 29561838

The Distribution of Income is Worse Than You Think: Including Pollution Impacts into Measures of Income Inequality

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Specialties General Medicine
Science
Date 2018 Mar 22
PMID 29561838
Citations 6
Authors
Nicholas Z Muller
Peter Hans Matthews
Virginia Wiltshire-Gordon
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper calculates the distribution of an adjusted measure of income that deducts damages due to exposure to air pollution from reported market income in the United States from 2011 to 2014. The Gini coefficient for this measure of adjusted income is 0.682 in 2011, as compared to 0.482 for market income. By 2014, we estimate that the Gini for adjusted income fell to 0.646, while the market income Gini did not appreciably change. The inclusion of air pollution damage acts like a regressive tax: with air pollution, the bottom 20% of households lose roughly 10% of the share of income, while the top 20% of households gain 10%. We find that, unlike the case for market income, New England is not the most unequal division with respect to adjusted income. Further, the difference between adjusted income for white and Hispanics is smaller than expected. However, the gap in augmented income between whites and African-Americans is widening.

Citing Articles

Health and equity implications of individual adaptation to air pollution in a changing climate.

Sparks M, Farahbakhsh I, Anand M, Bauch C, Conlon K, East J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(5):e2215685121.

PMID: 38227646 PMC: 10835109. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215685121.

Economic growth and household energy footprint inequality in China.

Zhu Q, Sang X, Li Z PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282300.

PMID: 36857403 PMC: 9977031. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282300.

Impacts of wind power on air quality, premature mortality, and exposure disparities in the United States.

Qiu M, Zigler C, Selin N Sci Adv. 2022; 8(48):eabn8762.

PMID: 36459553 PMC: 10936048. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn8762.

Air pollution, general government public-health expenditures and income inequality: Empirical analysis based on the spatial Durbin model.

Wu J, Pu Y PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0240053.

PMID: 33002068 PMC: 7529191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240053.

Racial, ethnic, and income disparities in air pollution: A study of excess emissions in Texas.

Li Z, Konisky D, Zirogiannis N PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0220696.

PMID: 31374099 PMC: 6677308. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220696.

References
1.
Perlin S, Setzer R, Creason J, Sexton K . Distribution of industrial air emissions by income and race in the United States: an approach using the toxic release inventory. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 29(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1021/es00001a008. View
2.
Krewski D, Jerrett M, Burnett R, Ma R, Hughes E, Shi Y . Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009; (140):5-114. View
3.
Bell M, Ebisu K, Peng R, Walker J, Samet J, Zeger S . Seasonal and regional short-term effects of fine particles on hospital admissions in 202 US counties, 1999-2005. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168(11):1301-10. PMC: 2732959. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn252. View
4.
Shindell D, Kuylenstierna J, Vignati E, Van Dingenen R, Amann M, Klimont Z . Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science. 2012; 335(6065):183-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1210026. View
5.
Fann N, Fulcher C, Hubbell B . The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2009; 2(3):169-176. PMC: 2770129. DOI: 10.1007/s11869-009-0044-0. View