Comparison of Bone Tunnel and Cortical Surface Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rabbit Model of Biceps Tenodesis

Overview

Journal J Bone Joint Surg Am

Specialties General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2018 Mar 21

PMID 29557864

Citations 21

Authors

Hongbo Tan

Dean Wang

Amir H Lebaschi

Ian D Hutchinson

Liang Ying

Xiang-Hua Deng

Scott A Rodeo

Russell F Warren

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Many orthopaedic surgical procedures involve reattachment of a single tendon to bone. Whether tendon-to-bone healing is better facilitated by tendon fixation within a bone tunnel or on a cortical surface is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tendon-healing within a bone tunnel compared with that on the cortical surface in a rabbit model of biceps tenodesis.

Methods: Thirty-two rabbits (24 weeks of age) underwent unilateral proximal biceps tenodesis with tendon fixation within a bone tunnel (BT group) or on the cortical surface (SA [surface attachment] group). Postoperatively, rabbits were allowed free-cage activity without immobilization. All rabbits were killed 8 weeks after surgery. Healing was assessed by biomechanical testing, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), and histomorphometric analysis.

Results: Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant difference between the groups in mean failure loads (BT: 56.8 ± 28.8 N, SA: 55.8 ± 14.9 N; p = 0.92) or stiffness (BT: 26.3 ± 16.6 N/mm, SA: 32.3 ± 9.6 N/mm; p = 0.34). Micro-CT analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the groups in mean volume of newly formed bone (BT: 69.3 ± 13.9 mm, SA: 65.5 ± 21.9 mm; p = 0.70) or tissue mineral density of newly formed bone (BT: 721.4 ± 10.9 mg/cm, SA: 698.6 ± 26.2 mg/cm; p = 0.07). On average, newly formed bone within the tunnel represented only 5% of the total new bone formed in the BT specimens. Histological analysis demonstrated tendon-bone interdigitation and early fibrocartilaginous zone formation on the outer cortical surface in both groups. In contrast, minimal tendon-bone bonding was observed within the tunnel in the BT specimens.

Conclusions: Tendon fixation in a bone tunnel and on the cortical surface resulted in similar healing profiles. For tendons placed within a bone tunnel, intratunnel healing was minimal compared with the healing outside the tunnel on the cortical surface.

Clinical Relevance: The creation of large bone tunnels, which can lead to stress risers and increase the risk of fracture, may not be necessary for biceps tenodesis procedures.

Citing Articles

Clinical Outcomes of Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction With Indication Guided by Intraoperative Ultrasound: A Propensity Score-Matched Study of 260 Patients With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Ripoll T, Vieira T, Saoudi S, Marris V, Nicolle R, Noguero A Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(1):23259671241298924.

PMID: 39839979 PMC: 11748147. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241298924.

Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an Onlay Technique.

Cutbush K, Stalin K, Ingoe H, Pareyon R, Ziegenfuss B, Gupta A Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 13(12):103123.

PMID: 39780895 PMC: 11704909. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103123.

Anatomic Distal Biceps Tendon Repair With All-Suture Cortical Buttons.

Chalmers C, Mange T, Wang D Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 13(12):103128.

PMID: 39780881 PMC: 11704897. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103128.

Arthroscopic Subdeltoid Transfer of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon to the Conjoint Tendon.

White A, Bryan M, OBrien S, Taylor S Arthrosc Tech. 2024; 12(12):e2313-e2319.

PMID: 38196857 PMC: 10773231. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.07.060.

Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.

Nicolay R, Jahandar A, Retzky J, Kontaxis A, Verma N, Fu M JSES Int. 2023; 7(6):2393-2399.

PMID: 37969507 PMC: 10638590. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.013.

References

Hopper R, Zhang J, Fourasier V, Protzner K, Pang C, Forrest C . Effect of isolation of periosteum and dura on the healing of rabbit calvarial inlay bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107(2):454-62. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200102000-00022. View

Mazzocca A, Cote M, Arciero C, Romeo A, Arciero R . Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36(10):1922-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508318192. View

Boileau P, Ahrens P, Hatzidakis A . Entrapment of the long head of the biceps tendon: the hourglass biceps--a cause of pain and locking of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13(3):249-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.001. View

Koch B, Burks R . Failure of biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy. 2012; 28(5):735-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.019. View

Rodeo S, Kawamura S, Kim H, Dynybil C, Ying L . Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(11):1790-800. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506290059. View

Sears B, Spencer E, Getz C . Humeral fracture following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in 2 active, healthy patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(6):e7-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.020. View

Buchholz A, Martetschlager F, Siebenlist S, Sandmann G, Hapfelmeier A, Lenich A . Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(5):845-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.010. View

Karaoglu S, Celik C, Korkusuz P . The effects of bone marrow or periosteum on tendon-to-bone tunnel healing in a rabbit model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 17(2):170-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0646-3. View

Tashjian R, Henninger H . Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(10):1408-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.039. View

10.

Boyer M, Harwood F, Ditsios K, Amiel D, Gelberman R, Silva M . Two-portal repair of canine flexor tendon insertion site injuries: histologic and immunohistochemical characterization of healing during the early postoperative period. J Hand Surg Am. 2003; 28(3):469-74. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2003.50091. View

11.

Mazzocca A, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo A, Arciero R . The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(11):1296-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.008. View

12.

Liu S, Panossian V, Tomin E, Shepherd E, Finerman G, Lane J . Morphology and matrix composition during early tendon to bone healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (339):253-60. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00034. View

13.

Millett P, Sanders B, Gobezie R, Braun S, Warner J . Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:121. PMC: 2553411. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-121. View

14.

St Pierre P, Olson E, Elliott J, OHair K, McKinney L, Ryan J . Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological evaluation in goats. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(12):1858-66. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199512000-00010. View

15.

Silva M, Thomopoulos S, Kusano N, Zaegel M, Harwood F, Matsuzaki H . Early healing of flexor tendon insertion site injuries: Tunnel repair is mechanically and histologically inferior to surface repair in a canine model. J Orthop Res. 2006; 24(5):990-1000. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20084. View

16.

Lim J, Hui J, Li L, Thambyah A, Goh J, Lee E . Enhancement of tendon graft osteointegration using mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(9):899-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.06.035. View

17.

Nho S, Reiff S, Verma N, Slabaugh M, Mazzocca A, Romeo A . Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(5):764-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.024. View

18.

Abtahi A, Granger E, Tashjian R . Complications after subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a dual suture anchor technique. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014; 8(2):47-50. PMC: 4124673. DOI: 10.4103/0973-6042.137527. View

19.

Dein E, Huri G, Gordon J, McFarland E . A humerus fracture in a baseball pitcher after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(4):877-9. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513519218. View

20.

Weiler A, Hoffmann R, Bail H, Rehm O, Sudkamp N . Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(2):124-35. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.30657. View