» Articles » PMID: 29552045

Single Layer Extended Release Two-in-One Guaifenesin Matrix Tablet: Formulation Method, Optimization, Release Kinetics Evaluation and Its Comparison with Mucinex Using Box-Behnken Design

Overview
Publisher Brieflands
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2018 Mar 20
PMID 29552045
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Guaifenesin, a highly water-soluble active (50 mg/mL), classified as a BCS class I drug. Owing to its poor flowability and compressibility, formulating tablets especially high-dose one, may be a challenge. Direct compression may not be feasible. Bilayer tablet technology applied to Mucinex®, endures challenges to deliver a robust formulation. To overcome challenges involved in bilayer-tablet manufacturing and powder compressibility, an optimized single layer tablet prepared by a binary mixture (Two-in-one), mimicking the dual drug release character of Mucinex was purposed. A 3-factor, 3-level Box-Behnken design was applied to optimize seven considered dependent variables (Release "%" in 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h) regarding different levels of independent one (X: Cetyl alcohol, X: Starch 1500, X: HPMC K100M amounts). Two granule portions were prepared using melt and wet granulations, blended together prior to compression. An optimum formulation was obtained (X: 37.10, X: 2, X: 42.49 mg). Desirability function was 0.616. F2 and f1 between release profiles of Mucinex® and the optimum formulation were 74 and 3, respectively. An n-value of about 0.5 for both optimum and Mucinex® formulations showed diffusion (Fickian) control mechanism. However, HPMC K100M rise in 70 mg accompanied cetyl alcohol rise in 60 mg led to first order kinetic (n = 0.6962). The K values of 1.56 represented an identical burst drug releases. Cetyl alcohol and starch 1500 modulated guaifenesin release from HPMC K100M matrices, while due to their binding properties, improved its poor flowability and compressibility, too.

References
1.
Shiyani B, Gattani S, Surana S . Formulation and evaluation of bi-layer tablet of metoclopramide hydrochloride and ibuprofen. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008; 9(3):818-27. PMC: 2977017. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-008-9116-y. View

2.
Nirmal J, Saisivam S, Peddanna C, Muralidharan S, Godwinkumar S, Nagarajan M . Bilayer tablets of atorvastatin calcium and nicotinic acid: formulation and evaluation. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2008; 56(10):1455-8. DOI: 10.1248/cpb.56.1455. View

3.
Akseli I, Dey D, Cetinkaya C . Mechanical property characterization of bilayered tablets using nondestructive air-coupled acoustics. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010; 11(1):90-102. PMC: 2850479. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-009-9352-9. View

4.
Pallagi E, Ambrus R, Szabo-Revesz P, Csoka I . Adaptation of the quality by design concept in early pharmaceutical development of an intranasal nanosized formulation. Int J Pharm. 2015; 491(1-2):384-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.06.018. View

5.
Kottala N, Abebe A, Sprockel O, Bergum J, Nikfar F, Cuitino A . Evaluation of the performance characteristics of bilayer tablets: Part I. Impact of material properties and process parameters on the strength of bilayer tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2012; 13(4):1236-42. PMC: 3513479. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-012-9845-9. View