» Articles » PMID: 29551302

Impact of Operative Time on Adverse Events Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Mar 20
PMID 29551302
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little is known regarding the impact of operative time on adverse events following arthroplasty. The present study tests for associations between a 15-minute increase in operative time and the occurrence of adverse events following primary total joint arthroplasty.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty during 2006-2013 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Operative time (as a continuous variable) was tested for association with perioperative outcomes using multivariate regression. All regressions were adjusted for differences in demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics.

Results: A total of 165,474 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (±standard deviation) operative time was 91.9 ± 32.5 minutes. Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, an increase in operative time by 15 minutes increased the risk of anemia requiring transfusion by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8%-10%, P < .001), wound dehiscence by 13% (95% CI = 8%-19%, P < .001), renal insufficiency by 9% (95% CI = 3%-14%, P < .001), sepsis by 10% (95% CI = 6%-14%, P < .001), surgical site infection by 9% (95% CI = 7%-12%, P < .001), and urinary tract infection by 4% (95% CI = 2%-6%, P < .001). Similarly, an increase in operative time by 15 minutes increased the risk of hospital readmission by 5% (95% CI = 4%-6%, P < .001) and of extended hospital length of stay (≥4 days) by 9% (95% CI = 8%-10%, P < .001).

Conclusion: The present study suggests that greater operative time increases the risk for multiple postoperative complications following total joint arthroplasty. These data suggest that surgeons should consider steps to minimize operative time without compromising the technical components of the surgical procedure.

Citing Articles

Computed tomography-based navigation versus accelerometer-based portable navigation in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis.

Tanaka S, Osawa Y, Takegami Y, Funahashi H, Ido H, Asamoto T Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):83.

PMID: 40024971 PMC: 11872758. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-025-04188-6.


Operative Time Learning Curve for an Image-Free Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.

Pagan C, Karasavvidis T, Siljander B, Debbi E, DeCook C, Vigdorchik J Arthroplast Today. 2025; 31():101588.

PMID: 39811772 PMC: 11730273. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101588.


All Enabling Technology Is Not Created Equal: Comparing Outcomes of Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation Versus Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Bernstein J, Gupta A, Kabiri M, Ruppenkamp J, Goldstein L, Diaz R J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024; 8(12).

PMID: 39719008 PMC: 11671058. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00324.


An explainable and supervised machine learning model for prediction of red blood cell transfusion in patients during hip fracture surgery.

Zhou Y, Wang S, Wu Z, Chen W, Yang D, Chen C BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):467.

PMID: 39702008 PMC: 11656766. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02832-y.


Direct Anterior vs. Posterior Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Machinski E, Leibovitch L, Park J, Sayudo I, Fernandes A, Liba T Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75795.

PMID: 39687673 PMC: 11648815. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75795.