» Articles » PMID: 29550836

Therapy for Children and Adults with Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Leukemia
Specialties Hematology
Oncology
Date 2018 Mar 19
PMID 29550836
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rarity of mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) has resulted in diffuse literature consisting of small case series, thus precluding a consensus treatment approach. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate the association of treatment type (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], acute myeloid leukemia [AML], or "hybrid" regimens), disease response, and survival. We searched seven databases from inception through June 2017 without age or language restriction. Included studies reported sufficient treatment detail for de novo MPAL classified according to the well-established European Group for Immunological Characterization of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) or World Health Organization (WHO2008) criteria. Meta-analyses and multivariable analyses of a patient-level compiled case series were performed for the endpoints of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS). We identified 97 reports from 33 countries meeting criteria, resulting in 1,499 unique patients with data, of whom 1,351 had sufficient detail for quantitative analysis of the study endpoints. Using either definition of MPAL, meta-analyses revealed that AML induction was less likely to achieve a CR as compared to ALL regimens, (WHO2008 odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.18-0.58; EGIL, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.40). Multivariable analysis of the patient-level data supported poorer efficacy for AML induction (versus ALL: OR = 0.45 95% CI 0.27-0.77). Meta-analyses similarly found better OS for those beginning with ALL versus AML therapy (WHO2008 OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77; EGIL, OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78), but multivariable analysis of patient-level data showed only those starting with hybrid therapy fared worse (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.11, 95% CI 1.30-3.43). MPAL definition did not impact trends within each endpoint and were similarly predictive of outcome. Using either definition of MPAL, ALL-therapy is associated with higher initial remission rates for MPAL and is at least equivalent to more intensive AML therapy for long-term survival. Prospective trials are needed to establish a uniform approach to this heterogeneous disease.

Citing Articles

[Safety and efficacy of mitoxantrone liposome combined chemotherapy in the treatment of mixed phenotype acute leukemia].

Jiang H, Lu C, He J, Wei Q, Su M, Wu Y Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2025; 46(1):64-69.

PMID: 40059684 PMC: 11886437. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20241210-00554.


[Blinatumomab-based combination treatment for CD19-positive acute leukemia of an ambiguous lineage].

Wu X, Yang Z, Lu C, Zhang X, Sun A, Zhou H Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2025; 45(11):1051-1054.

PMID: 39746700 PMC: 11886684. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240411-00133.


How to think about acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage.

Weinberg O Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2024; 2024(1):287-292.

PMID: 39644014 PMC: 11665627. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2024000554.


Acute leukemia with rearrangement: A master of disguise.

Bawek S, Wang E, Green S Leuk Res Rep. 2024; 21:100464.

PMID: 38903873 PMC: 11186854. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100464.


A hybrid protocol CLAG-M, a possible player for the first-line therapy of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia. A Polish Adult Leukemia Group experience.

Karasek M, Armatys A, Skarupski M, Bolkun L, Budziszewska K, Drozd-Sokolowska J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1395992.

PMID: 38835383 PMC: 11148324. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395992.


References
1.
Pomerantz A, Rodriguez-Rodriguez S, Demichelis-Gomez R, Barrera-Lumbreras G, Barrales-Benitez O, Lopez-Karpovitch X . Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: suboptimal treatment when the 2008/2016 WHO classification is used. Blood Res. 2017; 51(4):233-241. PMC: 5234234. DOI: 10.5045/br.2016.51.4.233. View

2.
Otsubo K, Yabe M, Yabe H, Fukumura A, Morimoto T, Kato M . Successful acute lymphoblastic leukemia-type therapy in two children with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia. Pediatr Int. 2016; 58(10):1072-1076. DOI: 10.1111/ped.13045. View

3.
Lopes G, Leitao J, Kaufman J, Duarte F, Matos D . T-cell/myeloid mixed-phenotype acute leukemia with monocytic differentiation and isolated 17p deletion. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014; 36(4):293-6. PMC: 4207906. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.03.004. View

4.
DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

5.
Mejstrikova E, Volejnikova J, Fronkova E, Zdrahalova K, Kalina T, Sterba J . Prognosis of children with mixed phenotype acute leukemia treated on the basis of consistent immunophenotypic criteria. Haematologica. 2010; 95(6):928-35. PMC: 2878790. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.014506. View