» Articles » PMID: 29550781

Development and Validation of a Casemix Classification to Predict Costs of Specialist Palliative Care Provision Across Inpatient Hospice, Hospital and Community Settings in the UK: a Study Protocol

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Mar 19
PMID 29550781
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Provision of palliative care is inequitable with wide variations across conditions and settings in the UK. Lack of a standard way to classify by case complexity is one of the principle obstacles to addressing this. We aim to develop and validate a casemix classification to support the prediction of costs of specialist palliative care provision.

Methods And Analysis: Phase I: A cohort study to determine the variables and potential classes to be included in a casemix classification. Data are collected from clinicians in palliative care services across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings on: patient demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. Cost predictors are derived using multivariate regression and then incorporated into a classification using classification and regression trees. Internal validation will be conducted by bootstrapping to quantify any optimism in the predictive performance (calibration and discrimination) of the developed classification. Phase II: A mixed-methods cohort study across settings for external validation of the classification developed in phase I. Patient and family caregiver data will be collected longitudinally on demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. This will be triangulated with data collected from clinicians on potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use, and with qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers about care provision across difference settings. The classification will be refined on the basis of its performance in the validation data set.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee. The results are expected to be disseminated in 2018 through papers for publication in major palliative care journals; policy briefs for clinicians, commissioning leads and policy makers; and lay summaries for patients and public.

Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN90752212.

Citing Articles

Costs of Palliative Care in Oncological and Non-Oncological Patients with Different Types of Ambulatory-Based Attention: Cost-Study Protocol.

Perea-Bello A, Trapero-Bertran M, Dursteler C Diseases. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39452486 PMC: 11507158. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12100243.


Experiences of transitioning between settings of care from the perspectives of patients with advanced illness receiving specialist palliative care and their family caregivers: A qualitative interview study.

Guo P, Pinto C, Edwards B, Pask S, Firth A, OBrien S Palliat Med. 2021; 36(1):124-134.

PMID: 34477022 PMC: 8793309. DOI: 10.1177/02692163211043371.


Adaptation of the Australian Palliative Care Phase concept to the German palliative care context: a mixed-methods approach using cognitive interviews and cross-sectional data.

Lehmann E, Hodiamont F, Landmesser M, Knobloch C, Nauck F, Ostgathe C BMC Palliat Care. 2021; 20(1):128.

PMID: 34391419 PMC: 8364299. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00825-z.


A systematic review of classifications systems to determine complexity of patient care needs in palliative care.

Grant M, de Graaf E, Teunissen S Palliat Med. 2021; 35(4):636-650.

PMID: 33706600 PMC: 8022082. DOI: 10.1177/0269216321996983.


Anxiety, depression and psychosocial needs are the most frequent concerns reported by patients: preliminary results of a comparative explorative analysis of two hospital-based palliative care teams in Germany and Japan.

van Oorschot B, Ishii K, Kusomoto Y, Overbeck L, Zetzl T, Roch C J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020; 127(11):1481-1489.

PMID: 32419058 PMC: 7578135. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-020-02186-y.


References
1.
Eagar K, Watters P, Currow D, Aoun S, Yates P . The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC)--measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis. Aust Health Rev. 2010; 34(2):186-92. DOI: 10.1071/AH08718. View

2.
Castro F, Kellison J, Boyd S, Kopak A . A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses. J Mix Methods Res. 2011; 4(4):342-360. PMC: 3235529. DOI: 10.1177/1558689810382916. View

3.
Koffman J, Higginson I, Hall S, Riley J, McCrone P, Gomes B . Bereaved relatives' views about participating in cancer research. Palliat Med. 2011; 26(4):379-83. DOI: 10.1177/0269216311405091. View

4.
. Funding the right care and support for everyone: creating a fair and transparent funding system. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011; 25(4):362-4. DOI: 10.3109/15360288.2011.621020. View

5.
Mather H, Guo P, Firth A, Davies J, Sykes N, Landon A . Phase of Illness in palliative care: Cross-sectional analysis of clinical data from community, hospital and hospice patients. Palliat Med. 2017; 32(2):404-412. PMC: 5788082. DOI: 10.1177/0269216317727157. View