» Articles » PMID: 29536262

Relative Age Effects Across and Within Female Sport Contexts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2018 Mar 15
PMID 29536262
Citations 74
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Subtle differences in chronological age within sport (bi-) annual-age groupings can contribute to immediate participation and long-term attainment discrepancies; known as the relative age effect. Voluminous studies have examined relative age effects in male sport; however, their prevalence and context-specific magnitude in female sport remain undetermined.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and magnitude of relative age effects in female sport via examination of published data spanning 1984-2016.

Methods: Registered with PROSPERO (No. 42016053497) and using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis systematic search guidelines, 57 studies were identified, containing 308 independent samples across 25 sports. Distribution data were synthesised using odds ratio meta-analyses, applying an invariance random-effects model. Follow-up subgroup category analyses examined whether relative age effect magnitudes were moderated by age group, competition level, sport type, sport context and study quality.

Results: When comparing the relatively oldest (quartile 1) vs. youngest (quartile 4) individuals across all female sport contexts, the overall pooled estimate identified a significant but small relative age effect (odds ratio = 1.25; 95% confidence interval 1.21-1.30; p = 0.01; odds ratio adjusted = 1.21). Subgroup analyses revealed the relative age effect magnitude was higher in pre-adolescent (≤ 11 years) and adolescent (12-14 years) age groups and at higher competition levels. Relative age effect magnitudes were higher in team-based and individual sport contexts associated with high physiological demands.

Conclusion: The findings highlight relative age effects are prevalent across the female sport contexts examined. Relative age effect magnitude is moderated by interactions between developmental stages, competition level and sport context demands. Modifications to sport policy, organisational and athlete development system structure, as well as practitioner intervention are recommended to prevent relative age effect-related participation and longer term attainment inequalities.

Citing Articles

Unveiling pathways: exploring chronological and maturational biases in a Spanish professional soccer academy.

Penin-Grandes S, Mesonero-Garcia S, Huertas Olmedo F, Gines Cabeza H, Ballester Lengua R Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 7:1476448.

PMID: 40051918 PMC: 11882527. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1476448.


Relative Age Effect Among World-Class Jump Athletes.

Xia Y, Zhang H J Sports Sci Med. 2025; 24(1):9-19.

PMID: 40046215 PMC: 11877291. DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2025.9.


Relative age effects in ice hockey extends to coaching.

Grondin S, Fortin-Guichard D, Lemoyne J, Trudeau F, Baker J Front Sports Act Living. 2025; 6():1507386.

PMID: 39867649 PMC: 11757298. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1507386.


Retrospective Analyses of Stability and Variability in Relative Age Effects of Handball Talents Over Seventeen Years.

Schorer J, Busch D, Faber I, Wattie N Sports Med Open. 2025; 11(1):6.

PMID: 39847273 PMC: 11757813. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00797-3.


Relative Age Effect (RAE) According to Norm Values on Anthropometric Performance and Physical Fitness in 9-11-Year-Old Children.

Kryeziu A, Begu B, Badau D, Iseni A J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39846673 PMC: 11755560. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010032.


References
1.
Schorer J, Cobley S, Busch D, BRAUTIGAM H, Baker J . Influences of competition level, gender, player nationality, career stage and playing position on relative age effects. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008; 19(5):720-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00838.x. View

2.
Okazaki F, Keller B, Fontana F, Gallagher J . The relative age effect among female Brazilian youth volleyball players. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011; 82(1):135-9. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599730. View

3.
Raschner C, Muller L, Hildebrandt C . The role of a relative age effect in the first winter Youth Olympic Games in 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2012; 46(15):1038-43. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091535. View

4.
Tanner J, Whitehouse R, Takaishi M . Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. Arch Dis Child. 1966; 41(219):454-71. PMC: 2019592. DOI: 10.1136/adc.41.219.454. View

5.
Delorme N, Raspaud M . The relative age effect in young French basketball players: a study on the whole population. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008; 19(2):235-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00781.x. View