» Articles » PMID: 29535150

Evolutionary Rescue over a Fitness Landscape

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2018 Mar 15
PMID 29535150
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evolutionary rescue describes a situation where adaptive evolution prevents the extinction of a population facing a stressing environment. Models of evolutionary rescue could in principle be used to predict the level of stress beyond which extinction becomes likely for species of conservation concern, or, conversely, the treatment levels most likely to limit the emergence of resistant pests or pathogens. Stress levels are known to affect both the rate of population decline (demographic effect) and the speed of adaptation (evolutionary effect), but the latter aspect has received less attention. Here, we address this issue using Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. In this model, the fitness effects of mutations depend both on the genotype and the environment in which they arise. In particular, the model introduces a dependence between the level of stress, the proportion of rescue mutants, and their costs before the onset of stress. We obtain analytic results under a strong-selection-weak-mutation regime, which we compare to simulations. We show that the effect of the environment on evolutionary rescue can be summarized into a single composite parameter quantifying the effective stress level, which is amenable to empirical measurement. We describe a narrow characteristic stress window over which the rescue probability drops from very likely to very unlikely as the level of stress increases. This drop is sharper than in previous models, as a result of the decreasing proportion of stress-resistant mutations as stress increases. We discuss how to test these predictions with rescue experiments across gradients of stress.

Citing Articles

Impacts of limits to adaptation on population and community persistence in a changing environment.

Chevin L, Bridle J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1917):20230322.

PMID: 39780591 PMC: 11712278. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0322.


Alternative mutational architectures producing identical -matrices can lead to different patterns of evolutionary divergence.

Jiang D, Pennell M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677663 PMC: 11642737. DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.11.553044.


Demographic feedbacks during evolutionary rescue can slow or speed adaptive evolution.

Draghi J, McGlothlin J, Kindsvater H Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2016):20231553.

PMID: 38351805 PMC: 10865011. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1553.


Evolutionary rescue on genotypic fitness landscapes.

Wahl L, Campos P J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(208):20230424.

PMID: 37963553 PMC: 10645506. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0424.


Drug-induced resistance evolution necessitates less aggressive treatment.

Kuosmanen T, Cairns J, Noble R, Beerenwinkel N, Mononen T, Mustonen V PLoS Comput Biol. 2021; 17(9):e1009418.

PMID: 34555024 PMC: 8491903. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009418.


References
1.
Trindade S, Sousa A, Gordo I . Antibiotic resistance and stress in the light of Fisher's model. Evolution. 2012; 66(12):3815-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01722.x. View

2.
Wang A, Sharp N, Agrawal A . Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: a case study with Drosophila. Evolution. 2013; 68(3):840-53. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12309. View

3.
Wang A, Sharp N, Spencer C, Tedman-Aucoin K, Agrawal A . Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat. 2009; 174(6):863-74. DOI: 10.1086/645088. View

4.
Gomulkiewicz R, Holt R, Barfield M, Nuismer S . Genetics, adaptation, and invasion in harsh environments. Evol Appl. 2015; 3(2):97-108. PMC: 3352474. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00117.x. View

5.
Martin G, Aguilee R, Ramsayer J, Kaltz O, Ronce O . The probability of evolutionary rescue: towards a quantitative comparison between theory and evolution experiments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 368(1610):20120088. PMC: 3538454. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0088. View