» Articles » PMID: 29534448

Measurements by A LEAP-Based Virtual Glove for the Hand Rehabilitation

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2018 Mar 15
PMID 29534448
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hand rehabilitation is fundamental after stroke or surgery. Traditional rehabilitation requires a therapist and implies high costs, stress for the patient, and subjective evaluation of the therapy effectiveness. Alternative approaches, based on mechanical and tracking-based gloves, can be really effective when used in virtual reality (VR) environments. Mechanical devices are often expensive, cumbersome, patient specific and hand specific, while tracking-based devices are not affected by these limitations but, especially if based on a single tracking sensor, could suffer from occlusions. In this paper, the implementation of a multi-sensors approach, the Virtual Glove (VG), based on the simultaneous use of two orthogonal LEAP motion controllers, is described. The VG is calibrated and static positioning measurements are compared with those collected with an accurate spatial positioning system. The positioning error is lower than 6 mm in a cylindrical region of interest of radius 10 cm and height 21 cm. Real-time hand tracking measurements are also performed, analysed and reported. Hand tracking measurements show that VG operated in real-time (60 fps), reduced occlusions, and managed two LEAP sensors correctly, without any temporal and spatial discontinuity when skipping from one sensor to the other. A video demonstrating the good performance of VG is also collected and presented in the Supplementary Materials. Results are promising but further work must be done to allow the calculation of the forces exerted by each finger when constrained by mechanical tools (e.g., peg-boards) and for reducing occlusions when grasping these tools. Although the VG is proposed for rehabilitation purposes, it could also be used for tele-operation of tools and robots, and for other VR applications.

Citing Articles

MOVING: A Multi-Modal Dataset of EEG Signals and Virtual Glove Hand Tracking.

Mattei E, Lozzi D, Di Matteo A, Cipriani A, Manes C, Placidi G Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(16).

PMID: 39204903 PMC: 11359383. DOI: 10.3390/s24165207.


Portable Head-Mounted System for Mobile Forearm Tracking.

Polsinelli M, Di Matteo A, Lozzi D, Mattei E, Mignosi F, Nazzicone L Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(7).

PMID: 38610437 PMC: 11014154. DOI: 10.3390/s24072227.


Patient-Therapist Cooperative Hand Telerehabilitation through a Novel Framework Involving the Virtual Glove System.

Placidi G, Di Matteo A, Lozzi D, Polsinelli M, Theodoridou E Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050523 PMC: 10098681. DOI: 10.3390/s23073463.


An Innovative Approach for Online Neuroanatomy and Neurorrehabilitation Teaching Based on 3D Virtual Anatomical Models Using Leap Motion Controller During COVID-19 Pandemic.

Obrero-Gaitan E, Nieto-Escamez F, Zagalaz-Anula N, Cortes-Perez I Front Psychol. 2021; 12:590196.

PMID: 34262499 PMC: 8273340. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590196.


Validity of Hololens Augmented Reality Head Mounted Display for Measuring Gait Parameters in Healthy Adults and Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Guinet A, Bouyer G, Otmane S, Desailly E Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(8).

PMID: 33920452 PMC: 8069043. DOI: 10.3390/s21082697.


References
1.
Kahn L, Lum P, Rymer W, Reinkensmeyer D . Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does?. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43(5):619-30. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.03.0056. View

2.
Arya K, Pandian S, Verma R, Garg R . Movement therapy induced neural reorganization and motor recovery in stroke: a review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011; 15(4):528-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2011.01.023. View

3.
Lum P, Godfrey S, Brokaw E, Holley R, Nichols D . Robotic approaches for rehabilitation of hand function after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(11 Suppl 3):S242-54. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcedb. View

4.
Burgar C, Lum P, Shor P, Van der Loos H . Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001; 37(6):663-73. View

5.
Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lunenburger L, Riener R, Bolliger M . Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(9):1737-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.029. View