» Articles » PMID: 29533226

Ensembles Generated from Crystal Structures of Single Distant Homologues Solve Challenging Molecular-replacement Cases in AMPLE

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2018 Mar 14
PMID 29533226
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Molecular replacement (MR) is the predominant route to solution of the phase problem in macromolecular crystallography. Although routine in many cases, it becomes more effortful and often impossible when the available experimental structures typically used as search models are only distantly homologous to the target. Nevertheless, with current powerful MR software, relatively small core structures shared between the target and known structure, of 20-40% of the overall structure for example, can succeed as search models where they can be isolated. Manual sculpting of such small structural cores is rarely attempted and is dependent on the crystallographer's expertise and understanding of the protein family in question. Automated search-model editing has previously been performed on the basis of sequence alignment, in order to eliminate, for example, side chains or loops that are not present in the target, or on the basis of structural features (e.g. solvent accessibility) or crystallographic parameters (e.g. B factors). Here, based on recent work demonstrating a correlation between evolutionary conservation and protein rigidity/packing, novel automated ways to derive edited search models from a given distant homologue over a range of sizes are presented. A variety of structure-based metrics, many readily obtained from online webservers, can be fed to the MR pipeline AMPLE to produce search models that succeed with a set of test cases where expertly manually edited comparators, further processed in diverse ways with MrBUMP, fail. Further significant performance gains result when the structure-based distance geometry method CONCOORD is used to generate ensembles from the distant homologue. To our knowledge, this is the first such approach whereby a single structure is meaningfully transformed into an ensemble for the purposes of MR. Additional cases further demonstrate the advantages of the approach. CONCOORD is freely available and computationally inexpensive, so these novel methods offer readily available new routes to solve difficult MR cases.

Citing Articles

The success rate of processed predicted models in molecular replacement: implications for experimental phasing in the AlphaFold era.

Keegan R, Simpkin A, Rigden D Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2024; 80(Pt 11):766-779.

PMID: 39360967 PMC: 11544426. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798324009380.


Modes and model building in SHELXE.

Uson I, Sheldrick G Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023; 80(Pt 1):4-15.

PMID: 38088896 PMC: 10833347. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798323010082.


Predicted models and CCP4.

Simpkin A, Caballero I, McNicholas S, Stevenson K, Jimenez E, Sanchez Rodriguez F Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2023; 79(Pt 9):806-819.

PMID: 37594303 PMC: 10478639. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798323006289.


The Automatic Solution of Macromolecular Crystal Structures via Molecular Replacement Techniques: REMO22 and Its Pipeline.

Carrozzini B, Cascarano G, Giacovazzo C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(7).

PMID: 37047043 PMC: 10094557. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24076070.


MrParse: finding homologues in the PDB and the EBI AlphaFold database for molecular replacement and more.

Simpkin A, Thomas J, Keegan R, Rigden D Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2022; 78(Pt 5):553-559.

PMID: 35503204 PMC: 9063843. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798322003576.


References
1.
Keegan R, Winn M . Automated search-model discovery and preparation for structure solution by molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007; 63(Pt 4):447-57. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444907002661. View

2.
Bibby J, Keegan R, Mayans O, Winn M, Rigden D . Application of the AMPLE cluster-and-truncate approach to NMR structures for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013; 69(Pt 11):2194-201. PMC: 3817692. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913018453. View

3.
Tiwari S, Fuglebakk E, Hollup S, Skjaerven L, Cragnolini T, Grindhaug S . WEBnm@ v2.0: Web server and services for comparing protein flexibility. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15:427. PMC: 4339738. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-014-0427-6. View

4.
Kabsch W, Sander C . Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983; 22(12):2577-637. DOI: 10.1002/bip.360221211. View

5.
Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, Li W, Godzik A . FFAS03: a server for profile--profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(Web Server issue):W284-8. PMC: 1160179. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki418. View