» Articles » PMID: 29532711

An Analysis of Individual Differences in Recognizing Monosyllabic Words Under the Speech Intelligibility Index Framework

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2018 Mar 14
PMID 29532711
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual differences in the recognition of monosyllabic words, either in isolation (NU6 test) or in sentence context (SPIN test), were investigated under the theoretical framework of the speech intelligibility index (SII). An adaptive psychophysical procedure, namely the quick-band-importance-function procedure, was developed to enable the fitting of the SII model to individual listeners. Using this procedure, the band importance function (i.e., the relative weights of speech information across the spectrum) and the link function relating the SII to recognition scores can be simultaneously estimated while requiring only 200 to 300 trials of testing. Octave-frequency band importance functions and link functions were estimated separately for NU6 and SPIN materials from 30 normal-hearing listeners who were naïve to speech recognition experiments. For each type of speech material, considerable individual differences in the spectral weights were observed in some but not all frequency regions. At frequencies where the greatest intersubject variability was found, the spectral weights were correlated between the two speech materials, suggesting that the variability in spectral weights reflected listener-originated factors.

Citing Articles

Multispecies initial numerical validation of an efficient algorithm prototype for auditory brainstem response hearing threshold estimation.

Petersen E, Shen Y J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(3):1674-1687.

PMID: 39254287 PMC: 11390134. DOI: 10.1121/10.0028537.


Toward parametric Bayesian adaptive procedures for multi-frequency categorical loudness scaling.

Shen Y, Petersen E, Neely S J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(1):262-277.

PMID: 38980101 PMC: 11240213. DOI: 10.1121/10.0026592.


Spectral weighting for sentence recognition in steady-state and amplitude-modulated noise.

Shen Y, Langley L JASA Express Lett. 2023; 3(5).

PMID: 37125871 PMC: 10155216. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017934.


Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Shen Y, Yun D, Liu Y J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148(3):1647.

PMID: 33003860 PMC: 7511242. DOI: 10.1121/10.0001994.


The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.

Best V, Roverud E, Baltzell L, Rennies J, Lavandier M J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 146(5):3215.

PMID: 31795657 PMC: 6847933. DOI: 10.1121/1.5131651.


References
1.
Hogan C, Turner C . High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 104(1):432-41. DOI: 10.1121/1.423247. View

2.
Jin I, Kates J, Lee K, Arehart K . Derivations of the band-importance function: A cross-procedure comparison. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 138(2):938-41. DOI: 10.1121/1.4927412. View

3.
Horwitz A, Ahlstrom J, Dubno J . Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51(3):798-813. PMC: 6688860. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/057). View

4.
Macpherson A, Akeroyd M . Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey. Trends Hear. 2014; 18. PMC: 4227668. DOI: 10.1177/2331216514537722. View

5.
Calandruccio L, Doherty K . Spectral weighting strategies for sentences measured by a correlational method. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(6):3827-36. DOI: 10.1121/1.2722211. View