» Articles » PMID: 29527096

Evaluation of the Ozone Fields in NASA's MERRA-2 Reanalysis

Overview
Journal J Clim
Date 2018 Mar 13
PMID 29527096
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We describe and assess the quality of the assimilated ozone product from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) produced at NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) spanning the time period from 1980 to present. MERRA-2 assimilates partial column ozone retrievals from a series of Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) radiometers on NASA and NOAA spacecraft between January 1980 and September 2004; starting in October 2004 retrieved ozone profiles from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and total column ozone from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument on NASA's EOS Aura satellite are assimilated. We compare the MERRA-2 ozone with independent satellite and ozonesonde data focusing on the representation of the spatial and temporal variability of stratospheric and upper tropospheric ozone and on implications of the change in the observing system from SBUV to EOS Aura. The comparisons show agreement within 10 % (standard deviation of the difference) between MERRA-2 profiles and independent satellite data in most of the stratosphere. The agreement improves after 2004 when EOS Aura data are assimilated. The standard deviation of the differences between the lower stratospheric and upper tropospheric MERRA-2 ozone and ozonesondes is 11.2 % and 24.5 %, respectively, with correlations of 0.8 and above, indicative of a realistic representation of the near-tropopause ozone variability in MERRA-2. The agreement improves significantly in the EOS Aura period, however MERRA-2 is biased low in the upper troposphere with respect to the ozonesondes. Caution is recommended when using MERRA-2 ozone for decadal changes and trend studies.

Citing Articles

Long term temporal trends in synoptic-scale weather conditions favoring significant tornado occurrence over the central United States.

Elkhouly M, Zick S, Ferreira M PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281312.

PMID: 36812264 PMC: 9946245. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281312.


NASA Satellite Measurements Show Global-Scale Reductions in Free Tropospheric Ozone in 2020 and Again in 2021 During COVID-19.

Ziemke J, Kramarova N, Frith S, Huang L, Haffner D, Wargan K Geophys Res Lett. 2022; 49(15):e2022GL098712.

PMID: 36247521 PMC: 9538536. DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098712.


An ozonesonde evaluation of spaceborne observations in the Andean tropics.

Cazorla M, Herrera E Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):15942.

PMID: 36153407 PMC: 9509352. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20303-7.


NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition.

Knowland K, Keller C, Wales P, Wargan K, Coy L, Johnson M J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2022; 14(6):e2021MS002852.

PMID: 35864944 PMC: 9287101. DOI: 10.1029/2021MS002852.


Satellite-Based Long-Term Spatiotemporal Patterns of Surface Ozone Concentrations in China: 2005-2019.

Zhu Q, Bi J, Liu X, Li S, Wang W, Zhao Y Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130(2):27004.

PMID: 35138921 PMC: 8827621. DOI: 10.1289/EHP9406.


References
1.
Hurst D, Lambert A, Read W, Davis S, Rosenlof K, Hall E . Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder stratospheric water vapor measurements by the NOAA frost point hygrometer. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2017; 119(3):1612-1625. PMC: 5571760. DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020757. View

2.
Coy L, Wargan K, Molod A, McCarty W, Pawson S . Structure and Dynamics of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation in MERRA-2. J Clim. 2018; 29(No14):5339-5354. PMC: 5853128. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0809.1. View

3.
Takacs L, Suarez M, Todling R . Maintaining Atmospheric Mass and Water Balance in Reanalyses. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2018; 142(697):1565-1573. PMC: 5890449. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2763. View

4.
Hubert D, Lambert J, Verhoelst T, Granville J, Keppens A, Baray J . Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of fourteen limb and occultation ozone profile data records. Atmos Meas Tech. 2018; 9(6):2497-2534. PMC: 5937289. DOI: 10.5194/amtd-8-6661-2015. View