» Articles » PMID: 29523981

Healthcare Efficiency Assessment Using DEA Analysis in the Slovak Republic

Overview
Journal Health Econ Rev
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 Mar 11
PMID 29523981
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A regional disparity is becoming increasingly important growth constraint. Policy makers need quantitative knowledge to design effective and targeted policies. In this paper, the regional efficiency of healthcare facilities in Slovakia is measured (2008-2015) using data envelopment analysis (DEA). The DEA is the dominant approach to assessing the efficiency of the healthcare system but also other economic areas. In this study, the window approach is introduced as an extension to the basic DEA models to evaluate healthcare technical efficiency in individual regions and quantify the basic regional disparities and discrepancies. The window DEA method was chosen since it leads to increased discrimination on results especially when applied to small samples and it enables year-by-year comparisons of the results. Two stable inputs (number of beds, number of medical staff), three variable inputs (number of all medical equipment, number of magnetic resonance (MR) devices, number of computed tomography (CT) devices) and two stable outputs (use of beds, average nursing time) were chosen as production variable in an output-oriented 4-year window DEA model for the assessment of technical efficiency in 8 regions. The database was made available from the National Health Information Center and the Slovak Statistical Office, as well as from the online databases Slovstat and DataCube. The aim of the paper is to quantify the impact of the non-standard Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) variables as the use of medical technologies (MR, CT) on the results of the assessment of the efficiency of the healthcare facilities and their adequacy in the evaluation of the monitored processes. The results of the analysis have shown that there is an indirect dependence between the values of the variables over time and the results of the estimated efficiency in all regions. The regions that had low values of the variables over time achieved a high degree of efficiency and vice versa. Interesting knowledge was that the gradual addition of variables number of MR, number of CT and number of medical devices together, to the input side did not have a significant impact on the overall estimated efficiency of healthcare facilities.

Citing Articles

Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015.

Jiang W, Lou X, Chen Q, Song L, Chen Z Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):16.

PMID: 40032743 PMC: 11877939. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00600-3.


Pursuing the efficient operation of the primary healthcare hospitals in Thailand through efficiency assessment using the data envelopment analysis method.

Juthamanee S, Wattanaburanon A, Rodjarkpai Y, Thongnopakun S, Puttakul W Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024; 25:e57.

PMID: 39468976 PMC: 11569852. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423624000513.


Approach in inputs & outputs selection of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) efficiency measurement in hospitals: A systematic review.

Zubir M, Noor A, Mohd Rizal A, Harith A, Abas M, Zakaria Z PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0293694.

PMID: 39141630 PMC: 11324144. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293694.


Medical equipment effectiveness evaluation model based on cone-constrained DEA and attention-based bi-LSTM.

Huang L, Lv W, Huang Q, Zhang H, Jin S, Chen T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9324.

PMID: 38654056 PMC: 11039725. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59852-4.


Efficiency analysis in the management of COVID-19 pandemic in India based on data envelopment analysis.

Mohanta K, Sharanappa D, Aggarwal A Curr Res Behav Sci. 2024; 2:100063.

PMID: 38620901 PMC: 8556177. DOI: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100063.


References
1.
Retzlaff-Roberts D, Chang C, Rubin R . Technical efficiency in the use of health care resources: a comparison of OECD countries. Health Policy. 2004; 69(1):55-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.002. View

2.
Li H, Dong S . Measuring and Benchmarking Technical Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Tianjin, China: A Bootstrap-Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Inquiry. 2015; 52. PMC: 5813654. DOI: 10.1177/0046958015605487. View

3.
Dy S, Kiley K, Ast K, Lupu D, Norton S, McMillan S . Measuring what matters: top-ranked quality indicators for hospice and palliative care from the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine and Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 49(4):773-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.01.012. View

4.
Czypionka T, Kraus M, Mayer S, Rohrling G . Efficiency, ownership, and financing of hospitals: the case of Austria. Health Care Manag Sci. 2013; 17(4):331-47. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-013-9256-9. View

5.
Oikonomou N, Tountas Y, Mariolis A, Souliotis K, Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos J . Measuring the efficiency of the Greek rural primary health care using a restricted DEA model; the case of southern and western Greece. Health Care Manag Sci. 2015; 19(4):313-325. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-015-9324-4. View