» Articles » PMID: 29523822

Using Dual Eye Tracking to Uncover Personal Gaze Patterns During Social Interaction

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Mar 11
PMID 29523822
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We report the personal eye gaze patterns of people engaged in face-to-face getting acquainted conversation. Considerable differences between individuals are underscored by a stability of eye gaze patterns within individuals. Results suggest the existence of an eye-mouth gaze continuum. This continuum includes some people showing a strong preference for eye gaze, some with a strong preference for mouth gaze, and others distributing their gaze between the eyes and mouth to varying extents. Additionally, we found evidence of within-participant consistency not just for location preference but also for the duration of fixations upon the eye and mouth regions. We also estimate that during a 4-minute getting acquainted conversation mutual face gaze constitutes about 60% of conversation that occurs via typically brief instances of 2.2 seconds. Mutual eye contact ranged from 0-45% of conversation, via very brief instances. This was despite participants subjectively perceiving eye contact occurring for about 70% of conversation. We argue that the subjective perception of eye contact is a product of mutual face gaze instead of actual mutual eye contact. We also outline the fast activity of gaze movements upon various locations both on and off face during a typical face-to-face conversation.

Citing Articles

Looking at Social Interactions in Medical Education with Dual Eye-Tracking Technology: A Scoping Review.

Lorenz J, Zevano J, Otto N, Schneider B, Papan C, Missler M MedEdPublish (2016). 2025; 14:215.

PMID: 39931308 PMC: 11809160. DOI: 10.12688/mep.20577.2.


Why the gaze behavior of expert physicians and novice medical students differ during a simulated medical interview: A mixed methods study.

Yamada R, Xu K, Kondo S, Fujimoto M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315405.

PMID: 39746055 PMC: 11694983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315405.


A modular machine learning tool for holistic and fine-grained behavioral analysis.

Michelot B, Corneyllie A, Thevenet M, Duffner S, Perrin F Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):24.

PMID: 39702505 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02511-3.


Looking, pointing, and talking together: How dyads of differential expertise coordinate attention during conversation.

Haraped L, Huber S, Bischof W, Kingstone A PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0315728.

PMID: 39700119 PMC: 11658607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315728.


Visualizing Empathy in Patient-Practitioner Interactions Using Eye-Tracking Technology: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Park Y, Kim H, Kim H JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e57884.

PMID: 39661986 PMC: 11655043. DOI: 10.2196/57884.


References
1.
Ho S, Foulsham T, Kingstone A . Speaking and Listening with the Eyes: Gaze Signaling during Dyadic Interactions. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0136905. PMC: 4550266. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136905. View

2.
Mehoudar E, Arizpe J, Baker C, Yovel G . Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers. J Vis. 2014; 14(7):6. PMC: 4062043. DOI: 10.1167/14.7.6. View

3.
Akechi H, Senju A, Uibo H, Kikuchi Y, Hasegawa T, Hietanen J . Attention to eye contact in the West and East: autonomic responses and evaluative ratings. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59312. PMC: 3596353. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059312. View

4.
Doherty-Sneddon G, Phelps F . Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty?. Mem Cognit. 2005; 33(4):727-33. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195338. View

5.
Boyarskaya E, Sebastian A, Bauermann T, Hecht H, Tuscher O . The Mona Lisa effect: neural correlates of centered and off-centered gaze. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 36(2):619-32. PMC: 6869588. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22651. View