» Articles » PMID: 29520508

Disease Burden of Fractures Among Patients with Osteoporosis in Japan: Health-related Quality of Life, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Economic Costs

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2018 Mar 10
PMID 29520508
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteoporosis remains undertreated in Japan, and bone fractures are the most frequent complications imposing heavy burden on individuals and the community. This paper investigates the clinical and economic burden of fractures among osteoporosis patients in Japan. The Japan National Health and Wellness Survey 2012-2014 database was used for analysis. Respondents aged ≥ 50 years and indicated a physician diagnosis of osteoporosis (N = 1107) were categorized into three subgroups: no prior fracture (N = 693), single fracture (N = 242), and multiple (≥ 2) fractures (N = 172). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment, healthcare resource utilization and associated direct and indirect costs were compared across three fracture subgroups adjusting for respondents' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics using generalized linear regression models. The estimated fracture prevalence among respondents with osteoporosis who were ≥ 50 years was 37.4%, of whom 41.5% had multiple fractures. Relative to osteoporosis respondents with no fracture and with single fracture, those with multiple fractures reported significant higher disability in HRQoL, more healthcare resource utilization, and were associated with higher direct costs. Improved treatment of fractures among osteoporosis patients is necessary and may help reduce the clinical and economic burden in this osteoporosis population.

Citing Articles

Availability of Observational Pain Assessment Tools in Hospitalized Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Yoshimi Y, Matsuura T, Miyazato K, Takahashi S, Tanaka N, Morinaga H Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(8).

PMID: 39202498 PMC: 11356710. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60081217.


Drug utilization pattern of romosozumab and other osteoporosis treatments in Japan, 2019-2021.

Soen S, Wang A, Hamaya E, Chien H, Lin T J Bone Miner Metab. 2024; 42(6):653-667.

PMID: 38987505 PMC: 11631996. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-024-01530-6.


Comparative effectiveness of denosumab vs alendronate among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Curtis J, Arora T, Liu Y, Lin T, Spangler L, Brunetti V J Bone Miner Res. 2024; 39(7):826-834.

PMID: 38753892 PMC: 11301726. DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae079.


Age and sex are excellent predictors of bone complications in patients with type 2 diabetes with no history of osteoporotic fracture or treatment for osteoporosis.

Yamamoto Y, Matsuba R, Nagasaka T, Shimizu S, Sakai K, Sone M J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(5):3000605241246743.

PMID: 38698517 PMC: 11304493. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241246743.


Body mass index, height, and osteoporotic fracture risk in community-dwelling Japanese people aged 40-74 years.

Nishikura T, Kitamura K, Watanabe Y, Kabasawa K, Takahashi A, Saito T J Bone Miner Metab. 2023; 42(1):47-59.

PMID: 38158407 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-023-01478-z.


References
1.
Reilly M, Zbrozek A, Dukes E . The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993; 4(5):353-65. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006. View

2.
Cauley J, Thompson D, Ensrud K, Scott J, Black D . Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(7):556-61. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070075. View

3.
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M . The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002; 21(2):271-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8. View

4.
Gabriel S, Tosteson A, Leibson C, Crowson C, Pond G, Hammond C . Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13(4):323-30. DOI: 10.1007/s001980200033. View

5.
Cummings S, Melton L . Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002; 359(9319):1761-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9. View