» Articles » PMID: 29520484

Totally Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Gallbladder Cancer: Technical Aspects and Long-Term Results

Overview
Journal World J Surg
Publisher Wiley
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2018 Mar 10
PMID 29520484
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare tumor in developed countries. Chile has one of the highest incidences worldwide. For patients affected by resectable T1b or more advanced GBC, radical cholecystectomy (RC) is considered the standard therapy. Our aim is to describe the surgical technique and clinical-pathological results of patients undergoing totally laparoscopic radical resection of GBC.

Methods: Patients undergo laparoscopic radical resection for primary and incidental GBC, between the years 2009 and 2016 in two centers from Chile. Patients in whom suspected bile duct invasion, frozen biopsy did not confirm cancer and para-aortic lymph node sampling was positive were excluded.

Results: Eighteen patients were operated, 77.8% were female with median age of 60.5 year, and 16 patients had previous cholecystectomy with incidental cancer finding. The median operative time was 490 min (400-550). No conversion to open surgery occurred. All patients achieved a R0 resection. Postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients (11.1%), and there was not mortality. After a median follow-up of 59 months, the 5-year survival was 80.7%.

Conclusion: This study shows the technical feasibility of the totally laparoscopic approach for radical resection of GBC with the same principles of classical open surgery. It appears that long-term oncological findings would also be similar at least in less advanced lesions.

Citing Articles

Oncologic safety of robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer.

Cho Y, Yun W, Jung H, Lee M, Han Y, Kwon W Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(12):9089-9097.

PMID: 37798528 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10463-6.


The technique of laparoscopic and robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer.

Kim K, Thrastardottir T, Choi S J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023; 26(1):43-45.

PMID: 36936041 PMC: 10020742. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.1.43.


Oncologic and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Extended Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Cancer.

Lee J, Kwon J, Lee J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(8).

PMID: 35456227 PMC: 9027168. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082132.


Robot-assisted radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: A review.

Jiayi W, Shelat V J Clin Transl Res. 2022; 8(2):103-109.

PMID: 35392126 PMC: 8983392.


Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.

Cao J, Wang Y, Zhang B, Hu J, Topatana W, Li S Front Oncol. 2021; 11:758319.

PMID: 34778076 PMC: 8580936. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.758319.


References
1.
Jin K, Lan H, Zhu T, He K, Teng L . Gallbladder carcinoma incidentally encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how to deal with it. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011; 13(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-011-0613-1. View

2.
Maker A, Butte J, Oxenberg J, Kuk D, Gonen M, Fong Y . Is port site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 19(2):409-17. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1850-9. View

3.
Roa I, Ibacache G, Munoz S, de Aretxabala X . Gallbladder cancer in Chile: Pathologic characteristics of survival and prognostic factors: analysis of 1,366 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014; 141(5):675-82. DOI: 10.1309/AJCPQT3ELN2BBCKA. View

4.
Fuks D, Regimbeau J, Pessaux P, Bachellier P, Raventos A, Mantion G . Is port-site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer?. J Visc Surg. 2013; 150(4):277-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.03.006. View

5.
Goetze T, Paolucci V . Adequate extent in radical re-resection of incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German Registry. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(9):2156-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0914-4. View