Chasing Red Herrings: Memory of Distractors Causes Fixation in Creative Problem Solving

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 2018 Mar 9

PMID 29516400

Citations 2

Authors

Zsolt Beda

Steven M Smith

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Two experiments tested the red herring retrieval hypothesis, which states that fixation in creative problem solving is worse when memory for red herrings (i.e., inappropriate or incorrect solutions) is strengthened. In Experiment 1, when associations between Remote Associates Test (RAT) problem words (e.g., COTTAGE, SWISS, CAKE) and related red herring words (e.g., hut, chocolate, icing) were strengthened via repetition, an encoding variable, fixation was found to increase. In Experiment 2, when associations were formed between RAT problem contexts and red herrings, then subsequent reinstatement of problem contexts during RAT problem solving trials (as compared with showing new contexts) also worsened fixation effects. Our results add to the increasing body of research that connects memory with creative problem solving, and they suggest possible ways for overcoming fixation effects.

Citing Articles

Context-dependent memory in the real world: the role of frequency and context dwell time.

Choi Y, Kim K, Moon S, Jung G, Cha J, Yim H Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1489039.

PMID: 39936112 PMC: 11810929. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1489039.

Sleep and incubation: Using problem reactivation during sleep to study forgetting fixation and unconscious processing during sleep incubation.

Sanders K, Beeman M J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2021; 33(6-7):738-756.

PMID: 34737850 PMC: 8562234. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1912050.

A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.

Wu C, Huang S, Chen P, Chen H Front Psychol. 2020; 11:573432.

PMID: 33192871 PMC: 7644781. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432.

References

Landau J, Leynes P . Do explicit memory manipulations affect the memory blocking effect?. Am J Psychol. 2006; 119(3):463-79. View

Jacoby L . Invariance in automatic influences of memory: toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998; 24(1):3-26. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.1.3. View

Smith S, Ward T, Schumacher J . Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Mem Cognit. 1993; 21(6):837-45. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202751. View

Smith S, Handy J, Hernandez A, Jacoby L . Context specificity of automatic influences of memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018; 44(10):1501-1513. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000523. View

Angello G, Storm B, Smith S . Overcoming fixation with repeated memory suppression. Memory. 2014; 23(3):381-9. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889167. View

Bowden E, Jung-Beeman M . Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004; 35(4):634-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195543. View

McDaniel M, Anderson D, Einstein G, OHalloran C . Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. Am J Psychol. 1989; 102(4):523-48. View

Weldon M, Bellinger K . Collective memory: collaborative and individual processes in remembering. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997; 23(5):1160-1175. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1160. View

Mednick S . The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev. 1962; 69:220-32. DOI: 10.1037/h0048850. View

10.

Smith S, Manzano I . Video context-dependent recall. Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42(1):292-301. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.292. View

11.

Kirsner K, Milech D, Standen P . Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon. Mem Cognit. 1983; 11(6):621-30. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198287. View

12.

Logan J, Balota D . Conscious and unconscious lexical retrieval blocking in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging. 2003; 18(3):537-50. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.537. View

13.

Wiley J . Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Mem Cognit. 1998; 26(4):716-30. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211392. View

14.

Kelley C, Jacoby L, Hollingshead A . Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(6):1101-8. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1101. View

15.

Mulligan N . Conceptual implicit memory and environmental context. Conscious Cogn. 2010; 20(3):737-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.11.008. View

16.

Chrysikou E, Weisberg R . Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005; 31(5):1134-48. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1134. View

17.

Smith S, Heath F, Vela E . Environmental context-dependent homophone spelling. Am J Psychol. 1990; 103(2):229-42. View

18.

Koppel R, Storm B . Escaping mental fixation: incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory. 2013; 22(4):340-8. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2013.789914. View

19.

Storm B, Angello G . Overcoming fixation. Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(9):1263-5. DOI: 10.1177/0956797610379864. View

20.

Glenberg A . Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Mem Cognit. 1979; 7(2):95-112. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197590. View