» Articles » PMID: 29516239

The Burden and Undertreatment of Fragility Fractures Among Senior Women

Overview
Journal Arch Osteoporos
Publisher Springer
Date 2018 Mar 9
PMID 29516239
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to estimate prevalence of fragility fractures (FF), risk factors, and treatment rates in senior women and to assess impact of FF on physical function and quality of life.

Methods: Women aged 65 years and older from the EpiReumaPt study (2011-2013) were evaluated. Rheumatologists collected data regarding FF, clinical risk factors for fractures, and osteoporosis (OP) treatment. Health-related quality of life (EQ5D) and physical function (HAQ) were analyzed. Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed. FF was defined as any self-reported low-impact fracture that occurred after 40 years of age. Prevalence estimates of FF were calculated.

Results: Among 3877 subjects evaluated in EpiReumaPt, 884 were senior women. The estimated prevalence of FF was 20.7%. Lower leg was the most frequent fracture site reported (37.8%) followed by wrist (18.6%). Only 7.1% of the senior women reporting a prevalent FF were under treatment for OP, and 13.9% never had treatment. OP treatment was not prescribed in 47.7% of FF women, and 23.4% refused treatment. Age (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.11-5.47), obesity (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.14-3.70), and low wrist BMD (OR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.20, 4.35; p = 0.012) were positively associated with prevalent FF. A significantly higher proportion of women in the lowest quintile of wrist bone mineral density reported FF (OR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.20-4.35). FF were associated with greater physical disability (β = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.51) independent of other comorbidities.

Conclusion: FF was frequently reported among senior women as an important cause of physical disability. However, the prevalence of OP treatment was low, which constitutes a public health problem in this vulnerable group.

Citing Articles

The impact of a Fracture Liaison Service after 3 years on secondary fracture prevention and mortality in a Portuguese tertiary center.

Silva S, Mazeda C, Vilas-Boas P, Portelada M, Eugenio G, Barcelos A Arch Osteoporos. 2023; 19(1):4.

PMID: 38110537 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01363-2.


Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.

Aibar-Almazan A, Voltes-Martinez A, Castellote-Caballero Y, Afanador-Restrepo D, Carcelen-Fraile M, Lopez-Ruiz E Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(16).

PMID: 36012730 PMC: 9408932. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169465.


Fragility fracture systems, Latin America perspective.

Rojas L, Cervantes R, Almejo L, Pesciallo C, Garabano G, Bidolegui F OTA Int. 2022; 5(3 Suppl):e178.

PMID: 35949494 PMC: 9359007. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000178.


Gaps and alternative surgical and non-surgical approaches in the bone fragility management: an updated review.

Tarantino U, Cariati I, Greggi C, Iundusi R, Gasbarra E, Iolascon G Osteoporos Int. 2022; 33(12):2467-2478.

PMID: 35851407 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06482-z.


Multimorbidity is associated with fragility fractures in women 50 years and older: A nationwide cross-sectional study.

Barcelos A, Lopes D, Canhao H, da Cunha Branco J, Rodrigues A Bone Rep. 2021; 15:101139.

PMID: 34754887 PMC: 8564033. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101139.