Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One's Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance

Overview

Journal J Agric Environ Ethics

Date 2018 Mar 9

PMID 29515330

Citations 10

Authors

Alberto Giubilini

Patrick Birkl

Thomas Douglas

Julian Savulescu

Hannah Maslen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Antibiotic use in animal farming is one of the main drivers of antibiotic resistance both in animals and in humans. In this paper we propose that one feasible and fair way to address this problem is to tax animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics. We argue that such tax is supported both by (a) deontological arguments, which are based on the duty individuals have to compensate society for the antibiotic resistance to which they are contributing through consumption of animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics; and (b) a cost-benefit analysis of taxing such animal products and of using revenue from the tax to fund alternatives to use of antibiotics in animal farming. Finally, we argue that such a tax would be fair because individuals who consume animal products obtained with the use of antibiotics can be held morally responsible, i.e. blameworthy, for their contribution to antibiotic resistance, in spite of the fact that each individual contribution is imperceptible.

Citing Articles

Transdisciplinary approaches to addressing factors that influence antimicrobial use in dairy cattle: A scoping review.

Cole J, Mughal A, Eltholth M, Thomas A, Holmes M Heliyon. 2024; 10(4):e25550.

PMID: 38379999 PMC: 10877173. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25550.

Applied Animal Ethics in Industrial Food Animal Production: Exploring the Role of the Veterinarian.

Hernandez E, Llonch P, Turner P Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35327076 PMC: 8944692. DOI: 10.3390/ani12060678.

Environmental and economic concerns surrounding restrictions on glyphosate use in corn.

Ye Z, Wu F, Hennessy D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(18).

PMID: 33903235 PMC: 8106354. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2017470118.

Reducing Antimicrobial Use and Dependence in Livestock Production Systems: A Social and Economic Sciences Perspective on an Interdisciplinary Approach.

Baudoin F, Hogeveen H, Wauters E Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:584593.

PMID: 33816582 PMC: 8012488. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.584593.

What High-Income States Should Do to Address Industrial Antibiotic Pollution.

Malmqvist E, Munthe C Public Health Ethics. 2021; 13(3):275-287.

PMID: 33391392 PMC: 7765630. DOI: 10.1093/phe/phaa020.

References

Graham J, Boland J, Silbergeld E . Growth promoting antibiotics in food animal production: an economic analysis. Public Health Rep. 2007; 122(1):79-87. PMC: 1804117. DOI: 10.1177/003335490712200111. View

Mendelson M, Matsoso M . The World Health Organization Global Action Plan for antimicrobial resistance. S Afr Med J. 2015; 105(5):325. DOI: 10.7196/samj.9644. View

Patterson J, Burkholder K . Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult Sci. 2003; 82(4):627-31. DOI: 10.1093/ps/82.4.627. View

Wierup M . The Swedish experience of the 1986 year ban of antimicrobial growth promoters, with special reference to animal health, disease prevention, productivity, and usage of antimicrobials. Microb Drug Resist. 2001; 7(2):183-90. DOI: 10.1089/10766290152045066. View

Anomaly J . Collective action and individual choice: rethinking how we regulate narcotics and antibiotics. J Med Ethics. 2013; 39(12):752-6. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101160. View

Cohen M, Tauxe R . Drug-resistant Salmonella in the United States: an epidemiologic perspective. Science. 1986; 234(4779):964-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.3535069. View

COATES M, Dickinson C, HARRISON G, KON S, CUMMINS S, CUTHBERTSON W . Mode of action of antibiotics in stimulating growth of chicks. Nature. 1951; 168(4269):332. DOI: 10.1038/168332a0. View

Allen H . Antibiotic resistance gene discovery in food-producing animals. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014; 19:25-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.06.001. View

Liu Y, Wang Y, Walsh T, Yi L, Zhang R, Spencer J . Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 16(2):161-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. View

10.

Castanon J . History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poult Sci. 2007; 86(11):2466-71. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00249. View

11.

Rudholm N . Economic implications of antibiotic resistance in a global economy. J Health Econ. 2002; 21(6):1071-83. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00053-x. View

12.

Dafwang I, BIRD H, Sunde M . Broiler chick growth response to antibiotics, 1981-1982. Poult Sci. 1984; 63(5):1027-32. DOI: 10.3382/ps.0631027. View

13.

Van Boeckel T, Brower C, Gilbert M, Grenfell B, Levin S, Robinson T . Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(18):5649-54. PMC: 4426470. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. View

14.

Jouany J, Morgavi D . Use of 'natural' products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal. 2012; 1(10):1443-66. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107000742. View

15.

Littmann J, Viens A . The Ethical Significance of Antimicrobial Resistance. Public Health Ethics. 2015; 8(3):209-224. PMC: 4638062. DOI: 10.1093/phe/phv025. View

16.

Stear M, Bishop S, Mallard B, Raadsma H . The sustainability, feasibility and desirability of breeding livestock for disease resistance. Res Vet Sci. 2001; 71(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1053/rvsc.2001.0496. View

17.

Shook G . Selection for disease resistance. J Dairy Sci. 1989; 72(5):1349-62. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79242-0. View