Online-based Interventions for Sexual Health Among Individuals with Cancer: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal BMC Health Serv Res

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Health Services

Date 2018 Mar 9

PMID 29514669

Citations 19

Authors

Hee Sun Kang

Hyun-Kyung Kim

Seong Man Park

Jung-Hee Kim

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Online interventions have the advantages of being widely available, accessible, comfortable, cost effective, and they can provide tailored information and support. Despite these benefits, the effects of specifically devised online intervention programs for cancer patients' sexual problems are somewhat unclear. The aim of this review is to describe online-based interventions and to assess their effects on sexual health among cancer survivors and/or their partners.

Methods: We investigated the effects of online sexual interventions among individuals with cancer or their partners. Among these, we considered 4 eligible articles.

Results: Despite the diversity of contents of the interventions, the identified modes of delivery among most of the interventions were as follows: education, interactive methods, cognitive behavior therapy, tailored information, and self-monitoring. Methods of monitoring the interventions, including the utilization of the web site and post-treatment program rating, were reported. All the online intervention programs incorporated a focus on physical, psychological, cognitive, and social aspects of sexual health. Significant effects on patient sexual function and interest and the psychological aspect of sexual problems were reported.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that online-based interventions would be effective in improving the psycho-sexual problems of cancer survivors and their partners.

Citing Articles

The Cancer Tracking System (CATSystem): Study protocol of a randomized control trial to evaluate a systems level intervention for cervical cancer screening, treatment, referral and follow up in Kenya.

Maloba M, Finocchario-Kessler S, Wexler C, Staggs V, Maosa N, Babu S PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318941.

PMID: 39965035 PMC: 11835318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318941.

A Non-Randomized Comparison of Online and In-Person Formats of the Canadian Androgen Deprivation Therapy Educational Program: Impacts on Side Effects, Bother, and Self-Efficacy.

Walker L, Sears C, Wibowo E, Robinson J, Matthew A, McLeod D Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(9):5040-5056.

PMID: 39330001 PMC: 11431469. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090373.

A multimodal couple-coping intervention for enhancing sexual adjustment among breast cancer women: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Chow K, Chan C, Choi K, McCarthy A PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309218.

PMID: 39172959 PMC: 11340947. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309218.

The effect of psychosocial interventions for sexual health in patients with pelvic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ask S, Schildmeijer K, Kaldo V, Hellstrom A Acta Oncol. 2024; 63:230-239.

PMID: 38682457 PMC: 11332557. DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24204.

Promoting Sexual Health in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Survivors: Results from a Systematic Review.

Rocha H, Carneiro B, Vasconcelos P, Pereira R, Quinta-Gomes A, Nobre P Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38275533 PMC: 10815307. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020253.

References

Katz A . The sounds of silence: sexuality information for cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 23(1):238-41. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.101. View

Ussher J, Perz J, Gilbert E . Information needs associated with changes to sexual well-being after breast cancer. J Adv Nurs. 2012; 69(2):327-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06010.x. View

Gorman J, Usita P, Madlensky L, Pierce J . Young breast cancer survivors: their perspectives on treatment decisions and fertility concerns. Cancer Nurs. 2010; 34(1):32-40. PMC: 2980796. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181e4528d. View

Traa M, de Vries J, Roukema J, Rutten H, Den Oudsten B . The sexual health care needs after colorectal cancer: the view of patients, partners, and health care professionals. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 22(3):763-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-2032-z. View

Flynn P, Kew F, Kisely S . Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (2):CD004708. PMC: 6513649. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004708.pub2. View

Leykin Y, Thekdi S, Shumay D, Munoz R, Riba M, Dunn L . Internet interventions for improving psychological well-being in psycho-oncology: review and recommendations. Psychooncology. 2011; 21(9):1016-25. PMC: 3181007. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1993. View

Traa M, de Vries J, Roukema J, den Oudsten B . Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011; 23(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr133. View

Cathala N, Brillat F, Mombet A, Lobel E, Prapotnich D, Alexandre L . Patient followup after radical prostatectomy by Internet medical file. J Urol. 2003; 170(6 Pt 1):2284-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000095876.39932.4a. View

Winterling J, Wiklander M, Micaux Obol C, Lampic C, Eriksson L, Pelters B . Development of a Self-Help Web-Based Intervention Targeting Young Cancer Patients With Sexual Problems and Fertility Distress in Collaboration With Patient Research Partners. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016; 5(2):e60. PMC: 4846786. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5499. View

10.

Li Q, Yuen Loke A . A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions. Psychooncology. 2014; 23(7):731-9. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3535. View

11.

Magnan M, Reynolds K . Barriers to addressing patient sexuality concerns across five areas of specialization. Clin Nurse Spec. 2006; 20(6):285-92. DOI: 10.1097/00002800-200611000-00009. View

12.

Aalbers T, Baars M, Olde Rikkert M . Characteristics of effective Internet-mediated interventions to change lifestyle in people aged 50 and older: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2011; 10(4):487-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.05.001. View

13.

Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(1):7-30. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21442. View

14.

Wang L, Pierdomenico A, Lefkowitz A, Brandt R . Female Sexual Health Training for Oncology Providers: New Applications. Sex Med. 2015; 3(3):189-97. PMC: 4599556. DOI: 10.1002/sm2.66. View

15.

Furmark T, Carlbring P, Hedman E, Sonnenstein A, Clevberger P, Bohman B . Guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 195(5):440-7. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060996. View

16.

King A, Evans M, Moore T, Paterson C, Sharp D, Persad R . Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015; 24(5):618-34. PMC: 5024073. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12286. View

17.

Jahangiry L, Shojaeizadeh D, Montazeri A, Najafi M, Mohammad K, Yaseri M . Adherence and Attrition in a Web-Based Lifestyle Intervention for People with Metabolic Syndrome. Iran J Public Health. 2015; 43(9):1248-58. PMC: 4500427. View

18.

Schover L, Yuan Y, Fellman B, Odensky E, Lewis P, Martinetti P . Efficacy trial of an Internet-based intervention for cancer-related female sexual dysfunction. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11(11):1389-97. PMC: 3831175. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0162. View

19.

Maiorino M, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Giugliano D, Esposito K . Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the Female Sexual Function Index. Endocrine. 2015; 54(2):329-341. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-015-0812-6. View

20.

Bouma G, Admiraal J, de Vries E, Schroder C, Walenkamp A, Reyners A . Internet-based support programs to alleviate psychosocial and physical symptoms in cancer patients: a literature analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015; 95(1):26-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.01.011. View